Radio and TV research Parliament wants
spin off research from the SRG. Opinions differ as to how
Ghosts. SRG is now presenting a new approach to solving this problem.
private broadcasters and the SRG are by no means subject to the same requirements.
An example: To obtain representative data on their programs,
SRG, which broadcasts on a regional basis, requires far fewer samples
than the private ones, which usually cover smaller rooms. Larger
Spot checks result in additional costs, but SRG does not have a
interest in diverting additional fee money for this purpose. The same applies
for target group research: Today Radiocontrol collects the
Radio usage of all listeners aged 15 and over who already want private radio
include 12-year-olds. However, the SRG, which is in favor of
its commercial-free radio programs can do without such data.
In the current situation, however, the SRG has a major role to play in radio and
TV research has the last word, because the research service is a
department within SRG. The company Publica Data AG, which is responsible for the
data to private broadcasters is wholly owned by SRG. This
situation is no longer satisfactory. The private sector criticizes the
lack of independence in research and demand more say.
And the SRG is afraid of ever new, cost-driving requests
of the private sector. SRG has also come to realize this,
that, for image reasons, it should not be both supplier and customer.
of research data (see box on the right).
There is also agreement between private broadcasters and SRG on one point:
Radio and TV research is to be outsourced from the SRG. This
In principle, Parliament has expressed this opinion in the RTVG debate.
connected. On the question of how this is to be achieved,
however, opinions differ widely. The Council of States wants to
solution to the radio and TV industry, the National Council wishes to
An independent foundation for utilization research (see Box 2).
He once again clearly confirmed this position at the second reading.
The Council of States must now decide in December whether it will continue its
open version or joins the National Council.
The differences between the councils roughly reflect the differences between the
Industry: Like the National Council, the private sector also wants to promote research
to a foundation and ultimately transfer the Board of Trustees to the federal government.
can be ordered. The SRG, on the other hand, prefers the Council of States route,
without state intervention.
Uncertainty is spreading
There is another difference between SRG and private broadcasters: The private broadcasters
are in no hurry with the matter, while SRG, on the other hand, wants the spin-off
as soon as possible, preferably by the end of 2005. Walter Rüegg, Director
of Radio DRS and responsible for research within SRG: "For
For us, the separation is a question of corporate governance. It also makes
among the staff of the research service due to the unresolved
situation, uncertainty is spreading." In order to prevent professionals from jumping ship
he therefore wants to press ahead with the reorganization. Already
an internal SRG working group under Rüegg's leadership has developed a model for this.
which was designed in two phases to create a new structure and a change of
ownership structure.
As a transitional solution, SRG is integrating the following in an initial phase
the research service into Publica Data AG and transfers the new
company Medienforschung Schweiz AG (working title) also includes all the necessary
Assets such as Radiocontrol or Telecontrolpanel. Media research
Switzerland would continue its research operations seamlessly and the
take over previous research and distribution contracts. Carrier
remains the SRG for the time being - 100 percent. The Publica
Data Board of Directors, which today also includes one representative each from the private and
Rüegg believes that the advertising industry could continue to exist.
"With the establishment of Medienforschung Schweiz AG, SRG is creating
transparent conditions in terms of personnel and accounting, thus paving the way for
pave the way for a future industry solution, but without
to anticipate," explains Rüegg.
After this first phase, SRG would no longer be in a hurry,
because, according to Rüegg, "the continuity and stability of the
research is secured".
The start of phase two, namely the transfer of media research
Switzerland AG to a new sponsoring organization would then be a matter for politicians and
the industry. Rüegg leaves it open as to how this is to happen and
outlines various possibilities: The shareholders of
Medienforschung Schweiz AG will be opened by selling shares at a
symbolic or actual value to interested associations and
organizations are sold, possibly with
Shareholders' agreement, voting rights agreement or
Disposal restrictions. Or: The interested associations and
Organizations establish a holding association or a
Holding Foundation, which acquired the shares of Medienforschung Schweiz AG from
of the SRG. Whether AG, association or foundation - according to the model
SRG does not claim a majority anywhere, only a qualified majority.
minority (25 to 49 percent). "It is important that majorities only ever
come about via coalitions," says Rüegg. He also considers it
central that the broadly composed and therefore cumbersome
sponsorship is in no way directly attributable to Medienforschung Schweiz AG
influence. Her main competence: she sets a
Board of Directors, which in turn elects a Chief Operating Officer (CEO).
No additional costs for private individuals
It is important to note that SRG has completed the first phase of Rüegg's
model on its own initiative and to implement it by the end of 2005
would like. However, the radio director emphasizes that he needs the consent of the
is important to private individuals. If their resistance is too great,
SRG would refrain from a spin-off. Nevertheless, SRG
various preparations have already been made, including having the
The assets of the company are currently being
Research Service and Publica Data AG. "It should help us
nobody can accuse us of having given false values afterwards",
says Rüegg. He therefore does not want to give any figures yet. Just this much:
Last year, Publica Data AG reported a small profit. Your
Income from the sale of data to private individuals plus the income from the
research service from the sale of data to the SRG units covered
just about the cost of research, says Rüegg. Whether media research
Schweiz AG is to be financed by fees in the future
Rüegg openly states that he himself does not believe this is necessary. Ultimately
determine the policy, he says. In any case, the
Outsourcing would be practically cost-neutral; at best
make minor savings in the area of personnel, he says.
There would therefore be no additional costs for private individuals.
The Rüegg model accommodates the private sector in two respects: Different
than a year ago, SRG is no longer fundamentally opposed to
against a foundation as the (supreme) sponsor of research. Secondly
it now grants the private sector the option to opt out if necessary.
only with a symbolic contribution to the new research company.
participate. In doing so, it takes away the private sector's objection that research is
paid out of fee money and belongs to everyone anyway, a little wind out of the
Sailing.
Whether this is enough, however, is questionable. "I believe that the positions
the most important still existing research on utilization in the entire RTVG.
difference between the two councils," says the Ticino native
CVP member of the Council of States Filippo Lombardi. A solution therefore also appears to be
in the distant future. Without a solution, the entry into force will be delayed
of the RTVA. Lombardi, who is also President of the Private TV Association
Telesuisse is therefore seeking a swift compromise. Recently
Walter Rüegg as well as representatives of Telesuisse and the
Association of Swiss Private Radio Stations (VSP) for a joint meeting
to discuss the Rüegg model. Lombardi
itself does not wish to make a statement in order to avoid a possible compromise.
not to jeopardize it. "If we want to be ready for the Council of States debate in December
be able to present a solution that is supported by the entire industry,
we gain time. If not, then politics will provide us with a solution.
but that will take a very long time," he says.
The VSP, on the other hand, sees no reason to rush. "Our base
remains the National Council's version: precisely because a foundation is inert
is, we want it to be a direct carrier of research, because that gives
more security for private individuals and grants research the greatest possible
Independence from the market," says VSP Vice President Martin Muerner. At the
VSP is in favor of putting the Rüegg model on ice for the time being and
It remains to be seen what the Council of States will decide. In addition, one is
convinced that many points of the Rüegg model are also compatible with the
foundation solution can be realized.
The IGEM (Interessengemeinschaft elektronische Medien) sees
things a little differently. After Rüegg presented his model there in September
the IGEM tenor was unanimous, according to the
IGEM President Urs Renner and emphasizes: "We are of the opinion that the
model points in the right direction, even if many details still need to be
are unresolved," he says. Renner knows what he is talking about, as he sits
the B.G. Media man representing the media agencies at Publica
Data on the Board of Directors.
Markus Knöpfli