The Commission believes that the democratic functions of the media are "increasingly being called into question". The Federal Council should therefore present a funding concept and a draft legal basis for indirect and direct media funding within two years. The supporters referred to the death of newspapers. In 2000, there were 45 independent newspapers. Today there are only 32, said Andreas Gross (SP/ZH) on behalf of the commission. This corresponds to a decline of 25 percent in ten years. Action must now be taken. The SVP and FDP parliamentary groups opposed the motion. However, the Council ultimately adopted the motion by 88 votes to 77 with 8 abstentions. The Council of States must now decide.
Structural change due to the Internet
The Swiss Press Association had called for a no vote (see below). The Federal Council also opposed the proposal. A major structural change is currently underway, said Media Minister Doris Leuthard, referring to the Internet. The industry is looking for business models. The Federal Council did not consider it sensible to intervene in this process of reorientation. Government intervention should only be considered if the industry cannot solve problems itself, Leuthard said. State support for the training and further education of journalists or VAT relief could be considered, for example.
New position assessment 2015
However, the Federal Council is not opposed to a constitutional provision "depending on developments". However, it would have to be clearly defined what the interests of the general public are, Leuthard pointed out. The Federal Council had already spoken out against state intervention in a report last summer. It does not want to make a new assessment until 2015. Should it then become apparent that the efforts of the media are not sufficient to ensure the services required from a state and democratic policy perspective, the Federal Council intends to consider additional support measures.
Discounted mail delivery
Direct press funding would require an amendment to the constitution. Today, the Swiss media are only supported by indirect measures. On the one hand, newspapers benefit from cheaper postal delivery and, on the other, from a special VAT rate.
The Federal Council intends to present a revised ordinance on this indirect funding in the second half of the year. It will not be a "revolution", said Leuthard. The existing rules had proved their worth.
Interference in entrepreneurial and journalistic freedoms
Schweizer Medien had already rejected the motion in advance, the association writes in a communiqué. The motion is intended to instruct the Federal Council to draw up an overall view of the media landscape. This alone does not pose a problem from a media freedom perspective. However, the Swiss Media Association believes that commissioning a concept to strengthen the media and demanding a legal basis for indirect and direct media funding before the results of such an overview are available are demands that are incompatible with media freedom in our country.
The communiqué goes on to say that the federal government cannot pay out subsidies that are not linked to conditions imposed on the recipient. Direct payments to the media therefore always mean an encroachment on entrepreneurial or journalistic freedoms, which is in conflict with the constitutional principle of media freedom. From the point of view of the separation of powers, state influence on the media, even under the guise of direct financial aid, should also be rejected. Schweizer Medien would consider it much more sensible to improve the framework conditions for the media, for example by not allowing state-funded broadcasting (radio and television) to distribute online advertising, as has been the case to date, by continuing to provide relief for the media in terms of VAT or by continuing to promote the distribution of press products through reduced rates in the future. Schweizer Medien will stand up for the independence of the private media and expressly rejects any state influence on the media companies.
Media freedom campaign disappointed
The Campaign for Media Freedom is disappointed with the outcome of today's vote by the National Council, which did not follow the recommendation to reject the Federal Council's proposal. The free market can only take place if media companies have entrepreneurial freedom and are in lively competition with each other. "The media must control the state and politics, not the other way around," says Filippo Leutenegger, President of the Campaign for Media Freedom. State intervention and support measures are always linked to regulations and controls, which not only restricts competition but also freedom of expression. (SDA/Verband Schweizer Medien/Aktion Medienfreiheit)
(Image: Keystone)