National Council Now Seeks Stricter Advertising Ban
The National Council has approved stricter rules governing the advertising of small loans. On Monday, it resolved all differences with the Council of States, with one exception. Parliament is initially relying on the industry to regulate itself.
The aim is to protect young people in particular from falling into debt. During the fall session, the Council of States had adopted stricter rules than those previously approved by the National Council. With regard to the details and enforcement of the ban, the National Council has now, by a majority vote, endorsed the Council of States’ proposals. The National Council unanimously granted the Federal Council the authority to intervene if it deems the industry’s agreement to be insufficient. In doing so, it followed the recommendation of its Economic Affairs Committee, which had aligned itself with the Upper House’s position on this point.
A separate motion by National Council member Christine Bulliard (CVP/FR) to reconsider this resolution stood no chance. It was rejected by a vote of 103 to 79, with one abstention. Representatives of the FDP and SVP argued in vain that this would grant the Federal Council a power that was «excessive and unnecessary,» as Andrea Caroni (FDP/SG) put it. The representatives of the FDP and SVP also lost on the question of the minimum duration required for a loan to be subject to the new provisions—albeit by a very narrow margin. The National Council approved the Council of States’ proposal to bring express loans under the Consumer Credit Act by a vote of 94 to 92, with 3 abstentions.
One point of disagreement remains, however: By a vote of 91 to 87, the National Council rejected the Council of States’ proposal that fines for violations of the rules be imposed not only for intentional acts but also for negligent ones. The bill will therefore return to the Council of States.
Two cantonal initiatives from the cantons of Basel-Landschaft and Geneva—one calling for better protection of young adults in training under the Consumer Credit Act and the other demanding a ban on consumer credit advertising and improved creditworthiness assessments—were tacitly rejected. The commission had recommended, by a vote of 13 to 0 with 10 abstentions, that the two cantonal initiatives not be pursued. The amendments to the Consumer Credit Act take into account the demands of both initiatives. (SDA)
Image: Keystone









