In principle, the small chamber was in favor of promoting online media. However, because it did not release the spending brake on this part of the bill, the funding has effectively been rejected. No money is allowed to flow. The plan was for 30 million francs per year.
A center-left majority had previously narrowly approved a legal basis for the promotion of online media by 22 votes to 19. Their tenor was that the package designed by the Federal Council was balanced.
Last word not spoken
Various speakers from the SVP, however, pointed out the lack of a constitutional basis. Thierry Burkart (FDP/AG) also questioned the economic necessity of this measure: "Online media do not need the money."
Both sides, opponents and proponents of online media funding, have now achieved a partial victory. The outcome is open. If the National Council approves the legal basis and at the same time releases the spending brake, online media could ultimately benefit from federal funding after all.
The prerequisite would be that the Council of States would then also approve the spending brake solution during its second deliberation. This requires a qualified majority of 24 votes. On Thursday, 22 Council members voted in favor, so two votes were missing.
Expansion of a proven instrument
During the sometimes chaotic end to the debate, other important decisions by the Council of States were temporarily pushed into the background. The small chamber had already spoken out in favor of expanding indirect press subsidies in the morning.
All subscribed daily and weekly newspapers are now to be supported - including national titles with a larger circulation as well as biweekly newspapers and magazines. The lower the circulation, the cheaper the postal delivery should be.
Publishers' maximum demand fails
In addition to the CHF 50 million for daily and weekly newspapers, the small chamber has also included support for the early delivery of newspapers and therefore also the Sunday press in the package of measures. This will cost the federal government an additional CHF 40 million per year.
This benefits titles that are not delivered to letterboxes by Swiss Post but by early delivery organizations. A proposal to expand early delivery even further to 60 million francs was narrowly defeated. This idea is in line with the wishes of the publishers' association.
The association and member press will also receive CHF 30 million per year instead of CHF 20 million. This decision was taken by 32 votes to 12.
"A piece of public service"
With the decisions of the Council of States, the federal contribution to indirect press funding will increase by CHF 50 million to CHF 120 million per year compared to the Federal Council's draft. In the opinion of the Council of States, publications in the specialist and specialized press as well as free newspapers should not benefit from indirect press subsidies.
There was no opposition to support for education and training institutions, the Press Council and the Keystone-SDA news agency. Paul Rechsteiner (SP/SG) described the latter as a "basic infrastructure for the media" and "a piece of public service".
The various institutions are to be supported with a maximum of CHF 30 million per year. Money is also to be provided for IT projects that are available to the entire sector. This part of the package is to be financed with a maximum of 2 percent from the proceeds of the radio and television license fee.
Financial policy reservations
In the overall vote, the Council of States approved the bill by 29 votes to 9 with 3 abstentions. The package was only strongly contested by representatives of the SVP. Hansjörg Knecht (SVP/AG) said that the financial policy situation did not permit subsidies for companies that were not under existential threat.
Thomas Minder (independent/SH) gave a fiery speech against the media package. He said it was "absurd" to support listed companies with federal funds, even though they generate hundreds of millions of francs in profit every year. "We are throwing taxpayers' money around."
Fear of further newspaper deaths
In contrast, partial subsidization of the media has become conceivable in recent months, even for liberal forces that have frowned upon state intervention for decades. And for the center-left, increased media funding is long overdue.
Commission spokesperson Stefan Engler (CVP/GR) took up the cudgels for the sector. Free and pluralistic media are indispensable, he said. "If we let the competition play out as it does today, media diversity will become impoverished." If things go on like this, there will soon be no more newspapers, said Eva Herzog (SP/BS). Publishers would no longer be able to recoup the advertising revenue lost to Google and Amazon.
No interference with content
"Diversity of opinion needs media diversity," summarized Media Minister Simonetta Sommaruga. If no action is taken, direct democracy will ultimately suffer. Sommaruga emphasized, however, that the independence of the media from the state must be safeguarded. "The state only improves the framework conditions, but it does not interfere in journalistic work and does not dictate content."
The National Council's Telecommunications Committee will next deal with the media package. The aim is to discuss the bill in the large chamber in the fall session.
For years, many newspaper titles, radio and television stations have been suffering from the loss of advertisements and commercials. Since the rise of the internet age, these can also be distributed outside the traditional media. (SDA)