Ovomaltine, Via/Radion laundry detergent, Lindt chocolate, the Opel Kadett, Maggi Golderbs soup, Union Bank of Switzerland, Pepsi Cola and Coop coffee: these eight products and companies were touted in the first commercial break. The spots, in black and white, showed ovomaltine-starched, athletic boys, men dreaming of an Opel with plenty of storage space for the girlfriend, and a German businessman raving about the Bankgesellschaft while on vacation in Ticino. Running ads was much more expensive back then than it is today. Broadcasting a 30-second spot cost 3600 francs, which would be the equivalent of 12'700 francs today. Today, a 30-second spot costs an average of only 3500 francs.
The hefty price had its reasons. There were hardly any other stations to which viewers could have switched, and the attention paid to the spots was high. The advertising association "Schweizer Reklame" wrote in May 1965: "Demand for the article has increased, as our customer assures us, at least 5-fold, and all because of the TV ads."
TV commercial Ovomaltine, 1965 (Source: Youtube/Ovaltine)
"Better than you had to fear"
The TV commercials were discussed intensively in the press. One newspaper praised the films as "solid and down-to-earth, graphically flawless. The Olten newspaper Das Volk wrote on February 3, 1965: "The flash films last 20 seconds, 30 seconds, once 40 or exceptionally 60 seconds. Whether this advertisement strikes like lightning is another question. You can hardly blow your nose, otherwise you've missed the nice little story." The Luzerner Vaterland was even more critical on May 1 of the same year: "One thing can be said today with full satisfaction: the spots are of better quality than one had to fear. Of course, this also means that the possibilities for comparison are not so good. What comes in over our borders is below a responsible limit."
For television, the commercials were the salvation: At the beginning of the 1960s, the young company, which had been on the air since 1953 as a trial operation and definitely from 1958, was on the brink of extinction. This was because the federal government had ordered it to do without advertising. The calculation did not work out: The fees paid by the 180,000 television households brought in only two million francs, too little for a daily program. In 1964, the Federal Council finally gave the go-ahead. After long negotiations, the newspaper publishers also agreed. In return, they were given a stake in the then marketing company AG für das Werbefernsehen (AG for advertising television), so that they could also earn something from TV advertising themselves.
Advertising should not interfere
For the SRG Director General at the time, Marcel Bezençon, it was clear: "The introduction of an advertisement that does not disturb the subscriber and that will bring in several millions is a success." In the very first year, television earned 21 million francs. Publishers also breathed a sigh of relief: The drop in advertising was only two percent. Until today, the allowed advertising time has been increased again and again. In the beginning, only 12 minutes per day were allowed. Now, the legal maximum for SRG is 15 percent of broadcasting time. However, only 12 minutes of advertising may be broadcast per hour. Interruptive advertising has been allowed since 1992. In 1998, the ban on advertising on Sundays and public holidays was dropped. It is difficult to say whether and to what extent viewers are bothered by the involuntary program breaks. Most complaints do not make it to the broadcasters.
Publisuisse, which emerged from the AG für das Werbefernsehen, collects all complaints from all language regions. In the past two years, there have been just 35 complaints, according to a statement made by Publisuisse. Moreover, the complaints tended to be of a content-related nature, for example because of the permissive "Love Life" campaign of the Federal Office of Public Health.
Publishers demand advertising ban for SRG
The publishers are less relaxed today. They have not held a stake in Publisuisse since 1995 and are on a confrontation course with the SRG, because the latter is contesting advertising revenues with the private sector and at the same time profiting from fees. At the beginning of the year, publisher president Hanspeter Lebrument therefore demanded that SRG get out of the advertising business. His proposal: SRG should receive the fees, while the private broadcasters should receive the advertising. This idea is not going down well with SRG. Without advertising, the broadcasters would have to forego 25 percent of their revenues. According to SRG, cuts would probably first have to be made in in-house productions, which are the most popular with viewers. The SRG is also convinced that the advertising money would then not end up with Swiss private broadcasters as intended, but with the advertising windows of RTL, Sat1 and others, i.e. abroad. (SDA)
Image: Keystone
The first commercial block can be seen at Publisuisse.ch