Not only the technology is different
Classifieds Market: Tool providers want to help publishers tackle the long-neglected classifieds problem. While their approaches and technologies vary greatly, so do their philosophies and business models.
The philosophy and business model are also different. Despite all the differences (see table), the five tools presented here also have things in common.
They enable publishers - at least according to the respective
provider - media break-free capture, design and management,
Disposition and billing of online and print advertisements. Some
also include mobile and even the administration of
cross-media orders in other media genres. Not every
However, the tool is suitable for all rubric areas, Prospective for the
example is only used in the job area, with other examples all
Classifieds (job, real estate, vehicle, contact, erotic, death, etc.)
and occasional advertisements). All
tools are web-based.
Access to media data
All solutions allow the advertiser to book mono and cross-media
(at least print and online), they also grant them freedom to choose where and
how he wants to do this. Via all these tools, the customer also has access to
current media data (at least tariffs, discounts, combos, mass and
completion dates). Cost calculations are generally possible, also
the customer all forms of advertisements (dealer or collective advertisements)
even according to complicated CI/CD specifications. Advertisers can
They can also manage their property and advertising portfolio online.
Not all tools are marketplace-compatible, but no tool prevents the
Connection to online marketplaces. Some, on the other hand, are almost
networking and offer themselves as a marketplace solution in which
In some cases, however, the degree of networking can be adjusted depending on the publishing strategy.
restrict. The publisher should check whether the tool is marketplace-compatible,
whether he remains completely free in his choice of partner when networking and
has all options open to him - or whether the rivalry
among the tool providers is restricted in any way or
could be disadvantaged.
Web spidering offers completely different options (and dangers),
searching the Internet for specific content, in this case
for classified ads from third-party providers. Three tool providers offer
this possibility. This is problematic insofar as it means that
prices and ultimately the entire classifieds market ad
could be made absurd - because which advertiser would still want to
pay for advertisements if they appear everywhere anyway? Spiders could
However, it is to a publisher's advantage if it is able to offer
online ads are missing in certain areas. This gap can then be
with advertisements that are harvested (free of charge) from third-party providers.
Markus Knöpfli
Comparing apples with oranges?
A comparison of five completely different solutions for the
The new category area only increases the tool salad for publishers,
fears one provider. It is important to make a very precise distinction between
booking tools and marketplace solutions are differentiated, warns one
others. Sure, the comparison is tricky. Nevertheless, we dare to make it (without
claim to be complete), because all the providers mentioned promise
to help publishers solve their problems in the classified section.
Throughout the comparison, we also endeavored to always use the
publisher optics. In the end, they have to choose a provider
and its solution. Likewise, with which business model he
wants to dock. And he needs to know what this means for him and his
advertising customers (in the longer term). Not included in the comparison
The differences in performance were also included,
Usability or logic. (mk)
Mediation commission comes up with a tit-for-tat solution
In the print sector, Publicitas alone determines which
advertising intermediaries with the Intermediary Commission (IC) for their
work. As is well known, this led to a lawsuit by the small
AdX, which is still pending before the Competition Commission.
is.
In the online sector, the situation is less one-sided: although the P
here, too, to whom it grants the UK (Prospective receives it), but since
P is neither the only nor the leading marketplace provider, it must
also have to accept returns. Specifically: Scout24 is not
VK-entitled, but conversely does not remunerate the P either if this
must place an advertisement on one of the Scout24 online marketplaces. (mk)
Markus Knöpfli
