The reason for the question was the lack of transparency in Weltwoche's ownership structure, which the court also considers to be the case. The author of the article "No transparent information world" printed on the media page of the NZZ was allowed to ask the question about the exertion of influence in the public interest. This is of particular importance in the media industry, according to the district court ruling of May 16, which is not yet legally binding and which the NZZ reported on Tuesday.
The interference with the personality of Weltwoche and its publisher and editor-in-chief Roger Köppel was therefore justified, writes the court. No other violations of personality were discernible.
Personality violated
Weltwoche and Roger Köppel had sued, claiming that their personalities had been unlawfully violated by the NZZ article. They demanded compensation of CHF 10,000. Although Weltwoche was not the focus of the article, it was mentioned several times as an example. The author wrote that the background to the sale of Weltwoche to Roger Köppel remained in the dark, and the question "Who acted as a noble benefactor?" continued to simmer.
As Weltwoche and Roger Köppel were completely unsuccessful in their claim, the court ordered them to pay the court costs of CHF 8,000. They were also ordered to pay the other party compensation of CHF 10,260. It remains to be seen whether Köppel will appeal the ruling, as he said on request. (SDA)