Federal Council must examine press subsidies
The Federal Council must examine how the media can be promoted in Switzerland. The Council of States has passed a motion from the National Council in a watered-down form.
The aim is to strengthen the democratic significance of the media. "If we want to remain the most beautiful democracy, we must give the regional press - but also the major newspapers - better weapons," said Claude Hêche (SP/JU). It was time to sound the alarm bell. Other speakers also emphasized that many small newspapers were in a bad way.
Felix Gutzwiller (FDP/ZH) countered that the structural change in the media landscape could not be stopped with state funds. Online media would also be able to offer diversity. Peter Föhn (SVP/SZ) opposed the review because it would anticipate the need for action.
Federal Councillor Doris Leuthard rejected the motion. She said that the publishing houses were against direct state aid. The question also arose as to how diversity and quality could be promoted with federal funds. The idea of supporting the training of journalists was under discussion.
Repeatedly against direct funding
The Federal Council has repeatedly spoken out against direct press subsidies, most recently in its report "Securing press diversity", which it presented a year ago. In this report, the Federal Council stated that the industry must manage the ongoing structural change itself. The Federal Council called on media companies to ensure, among other things, higher quality online offerings and to put them on an economically viable footing. The Federal Council held out the prospect of a new assessment and possible support measures for 2015. The proposal of measures is now mandatory. The motion "Safeguarding the state and democratic functions of the media" from the National Council's Political Institutions Committee calls for an overall view from a regional and national perspective. On the other hand, the Federal Council must draw up a support concept.
On Monday, the Council of States removed from the motion the requirement that the Federal Council must submit initial legal proposals for indirect or direct media funding within two years. The Council of States decided that deadlines should only be decided at a later date.
Today, the Swiss press is supported with indirect measures. For example, certain newspapers benefit from cheaper postal delivery. The membership press is supported by a reduced VAT rate. Direct support would require an amendment to the constitution. (sda)







