Schaffhausen is not Zurich
Electronic Media: The new radio and TV coverage areas for Switzerland proposed by Bakom are facing criticism in Schaffhausen. Local residents are insisting on autonomy.
independent coverage area of Schaffhausen. The geographical definition of the coverage areas forms the basis on which traditional media apply for new licenses for their stations and thus benefit from SRG fees under the new Radio and Television Act.
Biel, a special case for media in terms of supply due to its bilingualism, was defined as an independent area, whereas Schaffhausen was not. Neininger, however, also sees his media area as a special case. "If you want to maintain independent media, then you can't assign Schaffhausen to either Eastern Switzerland or Zurich."
The small canton would be in urgent need of the attribute, as Schaffhausen television is making annual losses of 100,000 to 200,000 francs. The broadcaster is dependent on cooperation and synergies with other regional media. "If you want to survive in the region, the media have to be able to function," says Neininger. A multimedia focus has long been a priority along the Rhine.
Two years ago, when the AG für Werbemedienforschung (Wemf) attempted to redraw the map of Swiss media centers with 20 instead of 25 economic areas, it caused a debacle in the industry and classified Schaffhausen as an independent media center. Before asking where media survive in Switzerland, the Wemf also analyzed commuter flows. In the case of Schaffhausen, those "commuting" to Zurich are largely compensated for by "commuters" from southern Germany. Such considerations were part of the argumentation in favor of an independent media area on the Rhine.
Neininger's assessment of Wemf is objective in that, as a board member of the Swiss Press Association and a member of the working group dealing with the supply areas, he has already been accused of being biased.
Neininger does not want a conflict At the time of publication of this issue of Werbewoche, the publishers' association is meeting to discuss the Bakom proposals. Neininger does not want to talk about a conflict with Bakom, which largely follows the ideas of the Swiss Press Association. However, the association will once again point out that it is not happy with the proposed division concerning Schaffhausen. "We don't belong to Zurich, we even beat Zurich in football," says Neininger.
"We at the publishers' association want to stick to our proposal with 14 regions," says Südostschweiz publisher and association president Hanspeter Lebrument. No amendments have been received within the association.
The publishers' proposal had previously caused unrest in connection with the broadcasting area of Günther Heuberger's eastern Switzerland station, Tele Top. Lebrument is distanced on this issue. "We have clearly defined the areas and have not issued any official or even official statements on individual broadcasters." In contrast to Bakom, the publishers did not recognize Tele Top's broadcasting area as a uniform area from the St. Gallen Rhine Valley to Winterthur.
Grossagglo finances program windowsBakom's proposal
provides for 13 coverage areas for private television stations, which will later benefit from license fees. According to a statement from OFCOM: "The new planning guidelines are turning the regional television landscape upside down: fewer licensed channels, but larger coverage areas for professional TV stations with a fee share. The areas now also include the large conurbations. There, the fee support will be used to finance program windows for the cantons of Schaffhausen and Glarus." Other new features include the fact that a uniform coverage area from Winterthur to the St. Gallen Rhine Valley is planned in eastern Switzerland and that the cantons of Vaud and Fribourg will be combined into one coverage area. The same would happen with Neuchâtel, Jura and the Bernese Jura. As a bilingual region, Biel will retain its own service area.
René Worni
