It is part of our professional ethics as media makers that editorial contributions are separated from advertising, publicity, public reports, whatever you call it, in a crystal-clear and recognizable way. Of course, you can't have a newspaper without advertising. And Werbewoche is also happy about every ad placed, every cent earned. That's how media making tastes today. Nevertheless, all of the many inquiries we receive as to whether a little PR and so on ... receive a clear message: "PR no! But if there's something newsworthy, we're all ears." Storytelling is still the best advertising. And if it still has to be a public report - the punch of which I doubt 100 percent - then please do so, but with the clearly legible headline "Public report". No, our readers are not stupid at all. And they don't want to be taken for fools either. Which is true for most readers.
Seen in this light, last Sunday was a Black Sunday for various Sunday newspapers and their readers, namely for those of Ostschweiz am Sonntag, Zentralschweiz am Sonntag, NZZ am Sonntag, all three papers of the NZZ Media Group, as well as for the readers of AZ Medien's Schweiz am Sonntag. All four papers in fact had an additional Bund, headed "Character" - of all things. The "additional Bund", exactly in the regular layout of the respective newspaper, turned out to be an eight-page brochure street of Mercedes-Benz. The clear indication that it was advertising was missing on all four frets. Whoever looked for it found the note "A Mercedes-Benz special bundle in the 'XYZ am Sonntag'" at the top of each page. But very tiny, alternatively sky blue and barely legible. And "Sonderbund" is rather euphemistic for this flat advertising supplement.
What do you want your readers to think, dear newspaper makers? And what do you want your employees to think? You put a cheaply made SUV ad on the same level as your (hopefully) hard-researched content that subscribers pay money for. Isn't that an insult to your readers? And a discrediting of your journalists? Doesn't matter, as long as the cash register isn't low anymore? You have earned quite a bit of money with this brochure route: 40,000 Swiss francs for Ostschweiz am Sonntag, 40,500 Swiss francs for Zentralschweiz am Sonntag, 41,000 Swiss francs for NZZ am Sonntag and 95,800 Swiss francs for Schweiz am Sonntag, if it has filled the entire edition with this unspeakable article. Business-minded or business-addicted? Sustainable in no case. I, for one, am disappointed with my NZZaS. By the way, the so-called "Sonderbund" opens with the following line: "Real personalities go their own way. Because they can." And the others? This almost seems to be a message with its tongue stuck out to the makers of the four Sunday newspapers. Or even to their readers: "sorry, we couldn't help it, we needed the money."
Journalists are expected to take responsibility for their articles, to act with moderation and prudence, not to endanger or attack anyone, and to follow moral principles. Shouldn't that be demanded of advertising salespeople and publishers? A highly visible, clear labeling of advertising would be the very least - which, by the way, is nothing new.
You think morals and ethics are big words for a small eight-page spread? I think morals and ethics don't start anywhere. And above all, they don't stop anywhere.
And something else on our own account:
Just under a year ago, I took over as editor-in-chief of Werbewoche from Pierre C. Meier. I didn't want to do everything new and different right away, but now the time has come: We want to arrive in the 21st century with the printed and digital Werbewoche and be ready for the future. Help us to do this. Please take a few minutes of your time and answer our Reader survey. After all, we make the advertising week for you. So we also need to know how you prefer to read it. Thank you very much!