Advertising in the crossfire
Criticism: Discriminatory, sexist, misleading, or simply untrue. Ads that caused a stir in 2007.
Criticism
Discriminatory, sexist, misleading or simply untrue. Advertising that caused a furor in 2007.
In the battle for attention, advertisers like to break taboos. This usually makes consumers smile. Nevertheless, for a few seconds of attention, the boundary of good taste is deliberately crossed again and again. Then the consumer complains. Take the Hornbach case, for example. In June, the women's magazine Annabelle included a brochure with the innocuous name "Woman at Work". In it, women advertised drills, angle grinders and double-sided adhesive tape. On closer inspection, however, the brochure revealed countless sexual innuendos. To the annoyance of many women, who then contacted the City of Zurich's Gender Equality Office. Dore Heim recalls: "The brochure irritated many women." Sex at the top of the listAlthough the number of sexist advertisements has decreased in recent years, revealing advertisements are still the cause of most complaints. Piero Schäfer from the Swiss Commission for Fair Trading: "We had to deal with almost 200 complaints last year. The majority because of sexist advertising." Piero Schäfer cannot say which campaign subjects triggered the most complaints, as the Fairness Commission does not collect statistics on this. However, an insight into the cases dealt with shows that consumers denounce advertising when there is no clear and relevant message. "Sex sells" is not accepted everywhere. In addition to the Hornbach brochure, the subjects of the fashion houses Bernies and Burger were in the crossfire of criticism. On the Bernies posters, a woman in a bad mood pours a glass of champagne in a man's face. Burger's images were scandalous because they showed pubic hair.
In addition to sex, discrimination was also used as a stylistic device to attract attention in 2007. At the end of the year, a Red Bull commercial that poked fun at the Christmas story caused a stir. In the commercial, four instead of three holy kings suddenly appear in the stable in Bethlehem. The secret is revealed: In addition to gold, frankincense and myrrh, the fourth in the bunch just happens to have a Red Bull can with him, which gives the angels wings. According to Peter Kaufmann from the television marketing company Publisuisse, many complaints were received after the first broadcast of the commercial. "That actually happens very rarely," says Kaufmann. The reason for viewers' indignation was that the Christmas story was being ridiculed too much. The commercial is causing a stir precisely because it takes the mockery of Christianity in its stride and deliberately avoids provocations against a certain other prophet in the media and advertising. According to Kaufmann, the commercial is now being discussed at Bakom.
Passugger upsets Coca-ColaIn 2007, the traditional Graubünden brand Passugger also wanted to break out of mediocrity. The mineral water attracted attention not because of ambiguous advertising or discrimination, but because of a slogan. Allegra-Mineralquellen AG advertised with "Passugger No. 1" and annoyed the fresh water strategists at Coca-Cola. The latter filed a complaint with the Fair Trade Commission because the slogan gave the impression that Passugger was the Swiss market leader. Following the decision against Passugger, the Graubünden-based company appears unimpressed and continues to advertise with "Passugger Nr.1". If Coca-Cola wants to take action against the "misleading and untrue" advertising, the company must take legal action.
Christian Lüscher?
Discriminatory, sexist, misleading or simply untrue. Advertising that caused a furor in 2007.
In the battle for attention, advertisers like to break taboos. This usually makes consumers smile. Nevertheless, for a few seconds of attention, the boundary of good taste is deliberately crossed again and again. Then the consumer complains. Take the Hornbach case, for example. In June, the women's magazine Annabelle included a brochure with the innocuous name "Woman at Work". In it, women advertised drills, angle grinders and double-sided adhesive tape. On closer inspection, however, the brochure revealed countless sexual innuendos. To the annoyance of many women, who then contacted the City of Zurich's Gender Equality Office. Dore Heim recalls: "The brochure irritated many women." Sex at the top of the listAlthough the number of sexist advertisements has decreased in recent years, revealing advertisements are still the cause of most complaints. Piero Schäfer from the Swiss Commission for Fair Trading: "We had to deal with almost 200 complaints last year. The majority because of sexist advertising." Piero Schäfer cannot say which campaign subjects triggered the most complaints, as the Fairness Commission does not collect statistics on this. However, an insight into the cases dealt with shows that consumers denounce advertising when there is no clear and relevant message. "Sex sells" is not accepted everywhere. In addition to the Hornbach brochure, the subjects of the fashion houses Bernies and Burger were in the crossfire of criticism. On the Bernies posters, a woman in a bad mood pours a glass of champagne in a man's face. Burger's images were scandalous because they showed pubic hair.
In addition to sex, discrimination was also used as a stylistic device to attract attention in 2007. At the end of the year, a Red Bull commercial that poked fun at the Christmas story caused a stir. In the commercial, four instead of three holy kings suddenly appear in the stable in Bethlehem. The secret is revealed: In addition to gold, frankincense and myrrh, the fourth in the bunch just happens to have a Red Bull can with him, which gives the angels wings. According to Peter Kaufmann from the television marketing company Publisuisse, many complaints were received after the first broadcast of the commercial. "That actually happens very rarely," says Kaufmann. The reason for viewers' indignation was that the Christmas story was being ridiculed too much. The commercial is causing a stir precisely because it takes the mockery of Christianity in its stride and deliberately avoids provocations against a certain other prophet in the media and advertising. According to Kaufmann, the commercial is now being discussed at Bakom.
Passugger upsets Coca-ColaIn 2007, the traditional Graubünden brand Passugger also wanted to break out of mediocrity. The mineral water attracted attention not because of ambiguous advertising or discrimination, but because of a slogan. Allegra-Mineralquellen AG advertised with "Passugger No. 1" and annoyed the fresh water strategists at Coca-Cola. The latter filed a complaint with the Fair Trade Commission because the slogan gave the impression that Passugger was the Swiss market leader. Following the decision against Passugger, the Graubünden-based company appears unimpressed and continues to advertise with "Passugger Nr.1". If Coca-Cola wants to take action against the "misleading and untrue" advertising, the company must take legal action.
Christian Lüscher?
