The reason for the system change is technological development. Even those who do not own a TV or radio can now receive corresponding broadcasts, for example via a smartphone or computer. Almost every household therefore has radio and TV reception. The fee regulation is to be adapted to this development.
Fee or tax?
A minority of the SVP did not want to accept the deal or to refer it back to the Federal Council. "A media tax is being introduced that is unconstitutional," said Natalie Rickli (SVP/ZH), explaining the motions, because it is a tax, not a fee, as the Federal Council claims. "A fee is paid for a service, the tax is unconditional." Since everyone is now being asked to pay, it is clearly a tax.
Rickli also tabled a motion to reject the proposal. Before the financing was newly regulated, a discussion about the public service had to be held. The Federal Council should prepare a message on the definition of the public service of television and radio. And a referendum should clarify whether the majority of the people and the cantons are willing to create a constitutional basis for a media tax.
Parliament does not want any delay
The majority, however, wanted to discuss the bill on Wednesday - the National Council decided by 119 to 68 votes "to enter" and did not reject the bill. Commission spokesman Martin Candinas spoke of an "unnecessary delay" if a referendum was first held or a fundamental discussion on the public service.
Parliament has instructed the Federal Council to work out a new, device-independent levy system, said Viola Amherd (CVP/VS). Not to discuss the bill now "would be a hairpin turn that can hardly be surpassed in terms of inconsistency". This was also pointed out by Federal Councillor Doris Leuthard. The Federal Council does not refuse to discuss the public service at all. But at the moment, the only issue is the financing of the public service, not its content.
No more controls necessary
In the new law, the Federal Council proposes that in future all households and all companies will have to pay a fee. The only exceptions would be people who receive supplementary benefits and small businesses with an annual turnover of less than CHF 500,000. Checks in households would no longer be necessary. The fees could be reduced from today's 462 francs per household to around 400 francs - since more households and companies would have to pay in under the new regulation. Overall, revenues would remain the same.
"Opting-Out" demanded
However, the revision of the law is controversial. Opponents of the bill are calling for a so-called "opting-out option" for households and/or companies that continue not to consume radio and television programs. However, the Federal Council and the advisory committee do not want to see any such softening. They argued that this would increase the administrative and control burden again and nullify the advantages of the revision.
Still no political advertising
Political advertising on radio and TV remains banned. During the debate, the National Council refused to relax the advertising regulations. Hans Killer (SVP/AG) had demanded that the ban on political advertising on radio and TV should be lifted. However, a majority in the National Council did not want to hear anything about this. Opponents argued that an advantage would be created for parties with a lot of money. (SDA)