On Friday, the Swiss Press Council issued its assessment in three complaint cases. The complaint by a public prosecutor against the Sonntagszeitung was partially upheld, while that of former CVP spokeswoman Spring was rejected, as was a complaint by the St. Gallen Teachers' Association against the St. Galler Tagblatt.
In an interview with the Kosovo-Albanian newspaper Lajim, the fugitive murderer justified his crime by saying that the teacher had raped his 14-year-old daughter. This was reproduced in the report on the interview in the St. Galler Tagblatt. The teachers' association objected to the uncommented reproduction, which suggested that the teacher had actually sexually abused the daughter. The privacy of the victim's family was also violated. The Press Council rejected the complaint because the report had been correctly classified. With regard to privacy, the Press Council stated that the report was certainly of public interest in view of the shocking crime, even though the crime took place several years ago. There was therefore no violation of privacy.
Former CVP communications chief Monika Spring's complaint against the NZZ am Sonntag and Sonntagszeitung newspapers was also rejected by the Press Council. Spring had complained that the newspapers had published private statements when they printed her criticism of the Catholic Church and the Pope and that she felt her privacy had been violated. The Press Council did not share this assessment and stated that media professionals may, under certain circumstances, assume that information is intended for the public. Spring's statements clearly fell within a political and professional context, the reasoning continued.
The complaint by a Zurich public prosecutor against the Sonntagszeitung was more successful. According to the complainant, his statement in connection with a supervisory complaint against him by Bank Vontobel should have been included in the article. The Sonntagsblatt had reported on the supervisory complaint filed by Bank Vontobel in connection with criminal proceedings against former executives of the bank. The methods of the Zurich public prosecutor's office were criticized. As the Press Council has now determined, the newspaper should not have been content with printing the denial of the complainant's superior, but should also have printed the statements on the serious allegations made by the complainant himself.