Photography After Aperture from Apple, Adobe now also has a solution for demanding photo amateurs and professionals with Lightroom. Developing software is no easy task. Apple chose the traditional and difficult path and released the image management software Aperture 1.0 a good 18 months ago. However, just as Adobe did with InDesign 1, Apple would have been better off waiting and releasing mature software later instead of a dubious 1.0 version. The RAW import, which was praised as a highlight, was not enough for discerning photographers, and Apple packed all the data into a database as the sole approach. At Photokina last fall, Apple reacted and launched the necessary update with Aperture 1.5, which now meets the otherwise very high Apple standard and also enables other forms of image data management. Version 1.5 also significantly reduced the price of the software. At the same time, Adobe launched a new beta version of its rival product Lightroom, which can be downloaded by anyone. The striking difference: while Apple tried to win back the favor of its customers with a revised version, Adobe let users test the software in advance. With the acquisition of Macromedia, Adobe adopted this approach of letting users evaluate programs and incorporate feedback. By integrating the platform formerly known as Macromedia Labs, Adobe will probably be able to avoid false starts like InDesign or Aperture in the future. In any case, Lightroom was spared a false start.
Two convincing solutionsThe current versions of both Aperture and Adobe Photoshop Lightroom, as they have been known since their market launch, are convincing professional image management programs. Both programs allow non-destructive image processing, which means that the original image remains unchanged and the processing steps are recorded separately from the original image. This means that earlier versions or the original material can be accessed at any time. Both Aperture and Lightroom also offer practical functions for easily presenting selected images on websites. Thanks to ready-made and easy-to-edit templates, attractive web photo galleries can be generated and uploaded in just a few simple steps. Lightroom has an integrated FTP function, while Aperture exports to folder structures that have to be uploaded manually. Both multifunctional programs also make it easier to print photo prints with the help of color management.
Advantages on both sidesVariable zooming, simultaneous zooming of adjacent images, the "smart" albums and smart web galleries, automatic stacking during import, one-click backup, integration with Apple programs such as iLife to create DVDs, films, podcasts or presentations are outstanding features of the current version of Aperture 1.5.3. The smart albums and directories in particular are a feature that should not be underestimated, as they significantly simplify image management. Images can also be sorted by metadata, which can be customized in a variety of ways. Aperture can also be controlled via AppleScript or Automator. Furthermore, all settings, metadata, albums and web galleries can be transferred as projects via the export function to a second station equipped with Aperture. The working environment can be set up in a variety of ways, split across several monitors and various list displays can be selected. Unique to Aperture is a layout environment and connection for designing and producing photo books.
With the challenger Lightroom, the precise control of the black and white conversion is pleasing. Thanks to the logged color and/or image corrections, it is possible to easily access alternative versions or create older versions. As a further plus, images can be provided with metadata during import or very easily excluded from import. While the less important image presentation on the monitor (slide show) is comparable to Aperture, Lightroom scores points when it comes to printing images, which is somewhat better adapted to the needs of photographers. It is very easy to create both individual images and image compilations for printing contact sheets. As a unique selling point, web galleries can be created within the "darkroom" in both HTML and Flash format, exported and uploaded to a web server via FTP as mentioned above. Lightroom offers significantly more options here; a larger selection of ready-made patterns is available, which can also be easily adjusted in terms of color.
More similarities than differencesThe organization of the Lightroom workflow into the steps "Library", "Develop", "Slideshow", "Print" and "Web" makes sense, even if it takes some getting used to; the somewhat loveless arrangement of the five words and thus the lack of symbols is incomprehensible. But that already covers its weak points. As far as the software design is concerned, the two programs have nothing in common. The customizable interfaces in black and grey tones are elegantly designed and signal that the products are aimed at Pro users.
However, there are significant differences in the hardware requirements, which will often be decisive. Apple has set the requirements for its customers incomprehensibly high. A G5 (from 1.6 GHz) is a must. It is therefore all the more surprising that Lightroom on the Apple platform (!) is satisfied with significantly less. A G4 computer and 768 MB RAM are sufficient here. A computer equipped with a Pentium 4 chip is also sufficient under Windows XP. For Windows users or Apple users with older hardware, the matter is clear. Apple users with the latest hardware should download demo versions of both programs and test them extensively. The decision between Aperture and Lightroom is ultimately a matter of taste. The bottom line is that the differences between Apple Aperture 1.5.3 and Adobe Photoshop Lightroom are marginal - with minor advantages and disadvantages on both sides.
Photo management on the Mac or PCIf you want to manage photos on your Mac or PC, you already have good tools for doing so at operating system level. Slideshows are available in Mac OS X as well as in Windows Vista, and simple management is possible via folder structures.
The next level are tools such as the new Adobe Bridge, which is supplied with every Creative Suite package. The new Bridge (CS 3) in particular enables very simple image management, allows keywording, allows images to be compared and even enables images to be imported directly in RAW format.
A high-quality and inexpensive program, but only for Mac users, is the iPhoto application integrated in the iLife package. However, this very unique image management solution hardly meets the requirements of professionals when it comes to data management in separate folder structures.
In addition to the programs Aperture and Adobe Photoshop Lightroom, Microsoft's Expression Media (formerly iView Media Pro), Fotostation (Mac/Win) from Fotoware or more comprehensive asset management solutions are enthroned above these applications.
Jürgen Franck