The code of conduct that the Swiss Public Affairs Association (SPAG) created two years ago to improve its image should make the exertion of influence on the political system more transparent: Lobbyists must disclose their clients on the SPAG website if they want to be a SPAG member. This should promote the "integrity and professionalism" of members as well as the "acceptance and recognition of the profession", as stated in the code of conduct. Employees of associations, companies or public administrations must list their employer and their function. Employees of agencies and law firms must disclose their client. Following the Kazakhstan affair involving National Councillor Christa Markwalder (FDP/BE), the SPAG Board recommended in December 2015 that "all contracts should be listed" in order to avoid damage to the image of members and the association.
An exemption for agency lobbyists was to be voted on at the Annual General Meeting (AGM) on Tuesday. This applies to mandates that have nothing to do with lobbying, explained SPAG Managing Director Robert P. Hilty on request.
Dilution vs. clarification
Opponents of the revision therefore spoke in advance of a watering down of the rules if "all mandates" no longer had to be declared, but only lobby mandates in the narrower sense. The members were presented with two proposals. In the end, the decision was postponed. However, the current, strict regulation, according to which "all mandates" must be declared in the lobbying association's register, can and is interpreted in different ways. Andreas Hugi from the agency furrerhugi assumes that only lobbying mandates are meant, i.e. external influence on the parliamentary legislative process.
And it was precisely this "fine-tuning" that the proposed and now postponed revision of the code of conduct was about, he said on request. Such a technical adjustment was justified two years after the creation of such regulations and based on experience. If communication mandates that did not serve to influence the political process also had to be declared, the lobbying mandates would be lost in the mass of various clients. "This would destroy the transparency value," said Hugi. Secondly, mandates could possibly no longer be accepted if the client does not wish to publicize them. "That's a high price to pay for membership of a lobbying association," said Hugi, who says he lists all clients of lobbying mandates on his website in the interests of transparency. According to SPAG board member Felix Schneuwly, the motions were about "a more or less narrow definition of lobbying", as he tweeted before the AGM. Walter Stüdeli, lobbyist at Köhler, Stüdeli & Partner and former SPAG Board member, replied: "If the AGM makes a decision that is contrary to practice, the agencies are out."
Hanspeter Thür takes the reins
The agency lobbyists are obviously not there yet. But they are examining how to proceed. "It is now up to SPAG to create the necessary clarity," says Matthias Graf, head of the communications agency Burson-Marsteller. The new President of the SPAG Standing Committee, former data protection officer Hanspeter Thür, also has a role to play. He is also responsible for part of the current debate. According to the Tages-anzeiger, one of the reasons given for the request to postpone the revision of the code of conduct was that Thür wanted to be involved in the amendment of the code of conduct. He himself said that he had first wanted to find out about the changes and form his own opinion before accepting the vote.
Expectations are high. Walter Stüdeli currently prefers to work on better rules rather than resign, as he said on request. At the same time, however, he is also calling on the Board to consistently expel members who do not comply with the rules. According to Hilty, nine members currently have to update their profiles before they appear on the SPAG website again. There have been no resignations as a result of the General Assembly's decision. SPAG currently has 237 members. (SDA)