Fashion magazine for managers
Men have little to do at Annabelle Business, but they still exert their influence
Men have little to do in Annabelle Business, but they still exert their influenceBy Markus Knöpfli With Annabelle Business, Tamedia took a chance on a business magazine despite poor economic data - and won: The 216 pages include around 60 pages of advertisements and several supplements.
In terms of content, the new magazine aims to be "a platform for women who are making their way", writes editor-in-chief Christa Löpfe-Feldmann. And that's exactly what you'll find: Portraits of women who have climbed the career ladder in more or less specialized companies or who have had success on their own and now have something to say. Carol Franklin, the former managing director of WWF Switzerland, for example, or Poland's central bank chief Hanna Gronkiewicz-Waltz. But men remain outside. Only one "quota man", this time André Dosé, is allowed to answer questions on one page at the end of the magazine.
The women portrayed are ostensibly role models, encouragers and advisors. But in doing so, the Annabelle Business editorial team and the women described fall into a clichéd role in which they hardly wanted to see themselves: that of the (substitute) mother. This is cemented several times in the content: The women are portrayed benevolently throughout the volume, there are hardly any critical questions, neither about their professional activities nor their approach to life. A large section of the magazine almost imposes its advice: Annabelle Business "tells you what to look out for", gives tips, advises, shows, helps, tests.
But do (prospective) businesswomen really want seven pages of information on how MTV boss Catherine Mühlemann dresses for which occasion? Do they need 10 pages of buying tips - from comfortable thongs to practical suitcases? Do they really need 24 pages of business looks? Always high-priced, of course, as befits a manager. Or is this all just a service for the advertisers?
Löpfe is probably right when she writes that Annabelle Business is not an "emancipatory magazine". It is also true that "men do not appear in it". Nevertheless, their influence is unmistakable. Beauty, elegance and eroticism - the attributes that men often like to reduce women in executive positions to - often come through. And where this is not the case in the editorial section, the male point of view comes into play in the advertisements section: just under 20 cosmetics, 10 jewelry, 10 wellness and fashion advertisements are offset by 8 advertisements in the banking/insurance section, 3 for cars, 2 each for spirits and education, one for real estate and none for travel - hardly a coincidence.
Did the advertisers confuse Annabelle Business with Annabelle? Or was the advertising manager - a man, of course! - was simply hitting on advertisers in an overly masculine way? Career women are likely to feel - once again - that they are not being taken seriously.
In terms of content, the new magazine aims to be "a platform for women who are making their way", writes editor-in-chief Christa Löpfe-Feldmann. And that's exactly what you'll find: Portraits of women who have climbed the career ladder in more or less specialized companies or who have had success on their own and now have something to say. Carol Franklin, the former managing director of WWF Switzerland, for example, or Poland's central bank chief Hanna Gronkiewicz-Waltz. But men remain outside. Only one "quota man", this time André Dosé, is allowed to answer questions on one page at the end of the magazine.
The women portrayed are ostensibly role models, encouragers and advisors. But in doing so, the Annabelle Business editorial team and the women described fall into a clichéd role in which they hardly wanted to see themselves: that of the (substitute) mother. This is cemented several times in the content: The women are portrayed benevolently throughout the volume, there are hardly any critical questions, neither about their professional activities nor their approach to life. A large section of the magazine almost imposes its advice: Annabelle Business "tells you what to look out for", gives tips, advises, shows, helps, tests.
But do (prospective) businesswomen really want seven pages of information on how MTV boss Catherine Mühlemann dresses for which occasion? Do they need 10 pages of buying tips - from comfortable thongs to practical suitcases? Do they really need 24 pages of business looks? Always high-priced, of course, as befits a manager. Or is this all just a service for the advertisers?
Löpfe is probably right when she writes that Annabelle Business is not an "emancipatory magazine". It is also true that "men do not appear in it". Nevertheless, their influence is unmistakable. Beauty, elegance and eroticism - the attributes that men often like to reduce women in executive positions to - often come through. And where this is not the case in the editorial section, the male point of view comes into play in the advertisements section: just under 20 cosmetics, 10 jewelry, 10 wellness and fashion advertisements are offset by 8 advertisements in the banking/insurance section, 3 for cars, 2 each for spirits and education, one for real estate and none for travel - hardly a coincidence.
Did the advertisers confuse Annabelle Business with Annabelle? Or was the advertising manager - a man, of course! - was simply hitting on advertisers in an overly masculine way? Career women are likely to feel - once again - that they are not being taken seriously.
