Surviving the crisis
Noted: A Never-Ending Wave of Layoffs in Journalism: How to Save Your Job—and Maybe Even Your Brain.
Column New waves of layoffs in journalism: How to save your head, and possibly even your brainGlad to see you healthy and alive, Mbwana! And this in these dark times! I'm glad you've escaped the bloodbaths in our industry so far - the small but steady massacres from the sacred NZZ to the farthest reaches of Mediacity.high time to talk about two important things: professional survival and personal style. A contradiction at first glance: the battle for survival is rarely won with top marks for attitude. And if you ask around on the carpet floors of publishing houses, there is very little talk of style, let alone daring style, when it comes to employees ("We at Tamtamedia are focusing on more dandyism in the face of the crisis!"), but far more often on efficiency, flexibility and other synonyms for more work, more fear, more adaptation.
On the other hand, two questions arise: 1. is what the company declares to be reasonable also reasonable for you? 2. is it profitable for the company what the company declares to be profitable? (Let's remember: these same carpetbaggers have recently enriched the media world with infallible projects such as Internet portals, private television, news-free news magazines or jokes such as a Sunday newspaper copy entitled NZZ). In contrast to their companies).
Following blindly is rarely advisable, even if the guide dog has a Master of Business Administration. ("You can send a donkey to Harvard - and get a donkey back", as Nicolas Hayek put it). It is certainly an obvious strategy to behave inconspicuously in the crisis of the journalism factories and to deliver precisely tailored goods on time. Professional inconspicuousness is not appreciated for nothing: After all, thousands of pages have to be filled every day. On the other hand, there are three serious objections to this: 1. why from you of all people? After all, your mother gave birth to you in great pain and hope - hardly for the purpose of writing the same routine texts as a thousand others. 2. your job is not safer because you work. Those who produce factory goods are themselves factory goods. And therefore replaceable. 3. why live in the media if you don't broadcast anything?
It is far more crisis-proof if your author line is not a layout element, but a name, an aesthetic, a program. You can fire uniqueness, but you can't replace it. And as far as the market is concerned: how many journalists do you know in this country with their own handwriting? (Exactly. They've been waiting for you. Welcome to the club!) And what's more, the recipe for enchanting an audience is not witchcraft: you just have to have something to say. And leave out everything else.
Sure, you need three things for this: some courage, some craft - and some power in your editorial office. How to write breathtaking articles on a regular basis and how to get them printed, the most important methods will come in six weeks - if you and I, Mbwana, are still healthy and alive then.
> Constantin Seibt is a political and business editor at the weekly newspaper WoZ.
On the other hand, two questions arise: 1. is what the company declares to be reasonable also reasonable for you? 2. is it profitable for the company what the company declares to be profitable? (Let's remember: these same carpetbaggers have recently enriched the media world with infallible projects such as Internet portals, private television, news-free news magazines or jokes such as a Sunday newspaper copy entitled NZZ). In contrast to their companies).
Following blindly is rarely advisable, even if the guide dog has a Master of Business Administration. ("You can send a donkey to Harvard - and get a donkey back", as Nicolas Hayek put it). It is certainly an obvious strategy to behave inconspicuously in the crisis of the journalism factories and to deliver precisely tailored goods on time. Professional inconspicuousness is not appreciated for nothing: After all, thousands of pages have to be filled every day. On the other hand, there are three serious objections to this: 1. why from you of all people? After all, your mother gave birth to you in great pain and hope - hardly for the purpose of writing the same routine texts as a thousand others. 2. your job is not safer because you work. Those who produce factory goods are themselves factory goods. And therefore replaceable. 3. why live in the media if you don't broadcast anything?
It is far more crisis-proof if your author line is not a layout element, but a name, an aesthetic, a program. You can fire uniqueness, but you can't replace it. And as far as the market is concerned: how many journalists do you know in this country with their own handwriting? (Exactly. They've been waiting for you. Welcome to the club!) And what's more, the recipe for enchanting an audience is not witchcraft: you just have to have something to say. And leave out everything else.
Sure, you need three things for this: some courage, some craft - and some power in your editorial office. How to write breathtaking articles on a regular basis and how to get them printed, the most important methods will come in six weeks - if you and I, Mbwana, are still healthy and alive then.
> Constantin Seibt is a political and business editor at the weekly newspaper WoZ.
