"I hope for objectification"
Weekly Press: Following the resignation of Editor-in-Chief Roger Köppel, the future of *Die Weltwoche* remains uncertain. Publishing Director Uli Rubner discusses his successor, circulation figures, and political party affiliations.
Wochenpresse Following the resignation of editor-in-chief Roger Köppel, the future of Weltwoche remains open. Publishing director Uli Rubner talks about succession, success figures and party-political attributions.WW There has been speculation about Roger Köppel's move to Springer since last summer. Ms. Rubner, what has the publishing house done to keep its journalistic turnaround manager? But I no longer take such industry rumors as seriously as I used to. Nevertheless, it was clear to me that he would follow a call to Germany sooner or later.
Now it has come to this sooner rather than later. In view of the Facts relaunch and declining circulation, a rather unfortunate
Timing for Weltwoche.
A change of editor-in-chief always involves certain risks. However, this departure also opens up new opportunities. Many cancellations of Weltwoche were due to its supposed SVP positioning. Such attributions are closely linked to Köppel as a person. With his departure, we can hope that the assessment of Weltwoche's performance and orientation will become more objective again.
Springer writes in its press release that Köppel has "decisively sharpened the profile of Weltwoche". But above all, he has also raised his own profile. Can this two-and-a-half-year symbiosis between the new boss and the old newspaper be dissolved without damage?
This kind of identification can be very fruitful - but only as long as it is not imposed by external party politics. If, for example, a story about the statistics on foreigners, as published in the last SonntagsZeitung, had appeared in Weltwoche, people would have been collectively and reflexively outraged by nasty SVP propaganda. In this respect, it may also be an advantage if Köppel, who has now become an irritant figure for many, leaves the game. Because however the succession is arranged: It offers the chance to make the discussion more objective. This does not mean that Weltwoche will also be saying goodbye to its liberal-bourgeois positioning with the editor-in-chief.
With his uncritical interview with Silvia Blocher, Köppel has
political arc for many readers and colleagues.
Okay, this story was a bit too much for me too. Like many others, I let him know that. And now he's also a little self-critical about the nature and timing of this interview.
However, the recent erosion in the reader market began last summer, long before the explicit election recommendation. Why did the new Weltwoche magazine's miracle bag aura fade so quickly?
After the format change, we had a thick trial subscription cover, which naturally melted away a little over time. As a result, it was mainly a matter of compensating for fixed subscription cancellations with new additions. After a long upward trend since the relaunch, we were no longer able to achieve the hoped-for growth rates from the fall onwards.
So you weren't able to make up for the subscription gap with newsstand sales of provocative Blocher issues.
Around the time of the Federal Council elections, all the publications featured Blocher and thus boosted their sales. Nevertheless, sales were generally good last fall, but not brilliant. The thriftiness of newsstand customers was felt by everyone, from Blick to Weltwoche.
Will Weltwoche once again be able to achieve six-figure certification this year?
It won't quite be enough for that yet. However, the current print run is well above the 91,000 copies we published last year.
reached. You must also remember that Wemf measured 85,000 copies in 2001, so we have already made a big leap. Nevertheless, we will be careful not to be too euphoric.
In its current issue, the SonntagsZeitung concludes that the decline in sales is due to a loss of reach.
Rightly so?
This is wrong and misleading. Circulation and readership figures are often lumped together. We are talking about key figures that may or may not correlate. Subscription certification is due on April 1, and we will be among the winners there. However, we will have to wait until the fall to see the new readership figures.
The same article cites fewer pick-ups, i.e. declining readers-per-issue figures, as a further reason for the supposed dip in readership growth.
This is also technically incorrect. What is correct is that both circulation and reach increased after the format change. As a magazine, Weltwoche is therefore not only selling better, but is also being read by more people. We naturally hoped for and built on this double effect in the run-up to the relaunch.
Who decides on Roger Köppel's successor?
Ultimately, our CEO Filippo Leutenegger together with the Board of Directors.
The only basic maxim to which Köppel publicly subscribes is that
the truth about costs. So is a journalistic mastermind with a penchant for stretching budgets, such as Roger de Weck, out of the question from the outset?
I cannot comment on specific names in my role. But there's no question that we initially needed a journalistic messiah like Roger Köppel, whose recognized strengths such as originality and courage enabled him to live up to huge expectations. Without such a personality, we would not have achieved the turnaround. The successor can build on what has been achieved and benefits from the image of a winning title. His task is easier.
Interview:
In the blackAs CEO Filippo Leutenegger announced at a media conference, Jean Frey Verlag (Weltwoche, Beobachter, Bilanz, TR7) achieved a profit after tax of "a good 10 million francs" in 2003. This on a turnover of almost 100 million francs and an operating result of just under 10 million francs. The last annual financial statements of the previous owner, Basler Zeitung Medien, in mid-2002 still showed a
Loss of 12 million francs.
According to Leutenegger, this turnaround is due to his own
According to the information provided, almost two-thirds of this was due to the rigid cost-cutting measures in the areas of printing, personnel and IT. The rest was due to the increase in advertising and sales revenue at Weltwoche, the "excellent performance" of TR7 and the growing number of subscribers to the "still highly profitable" Beobachter. At the same time, the CEO denied all rumors of an imminent sale of Jean Frey and announced the imminent creation of an internal ombudsman's office. (oc)
With the Silvia Blocher interview, Weltwoche maneuvered itself into the SVP twilight.
Weltwoche publishing director Uli Rubner.
Oliver Classen
Now it has come to this sooner rather than later. In view of the Facts relaunch and declining circulation, a rather unfortunate
Timing for Weltwoche.
A change of editor-in-chief always involves certain risks. However, this departure also opens up new opportunities. Many cancellations of Weltwoche were due to its supposed SVP positioning. Such attributions are closely linked to Köppel as a person. With his departure, we can hope that the assessment of Weltwoche's performance and orientation will become more objective again.
Springer writes in its press release that Köppel has "decisively sharpened the profile of Weltwoche". But above all, he has also raised his own profile. Can this two-and-a-half-year symbiosis between the new boss and the old newspaper be dissolved without damage?
This kind of identification can be very fruitful - but only as long as it is not imposed by external party politics. If, for example, a story about the statistics on foreigners, as published in the last SonntagsZeitung, had appeared in Weltwoche, people would have been collectively and reflexively outraged by nasty SVP propaganda. In this respect, it may also be an advantage if Köppel, who has now become an irritant figure for many, leaves the game. Because however the succession is arranged: It offers the chance to make the discussion more objective. This does not mean that Weltwoche will also be saying goodbye to its liberal-bourgeois positioning with the editor-in-chief.
With his uncritical interview with Silvia Blocher, Köppel has
political arc for many readers and colleagues.
Okay, this story was a bit too much for me too. Like many others, I let him know that. And now he's also a little self-critical about the nature and timing of this interview.
However, the recent erosion in the reader market began last summer, long before the explicit election recommendation. Why did the new Weltwoche magazine's miracle bag aura fade so quickly?
After the format change, we had a thick trial subscription cover, which naturally melted away a little over time. As a result, it was mainly a matter of compensating for fixed subscription cancellations with new additions. After a long upward trend since the relaunch, we were no longer able to achieve the hoped-for growth rates from the fall onwards.
So you weren't able to make up for the subscription gap with newsstand sales of provocative Blocher issues.
Around the time of the Federal Council elections, all the publications featured Blocher and thus boosted their sales. Nevertheless, sales were generally good last fall, but not brilliant. The thriftiness of newsstand customers was felt by everyone, from Blick to Weltwoche.
Will Weltwoche once again be able to achieve six-figure certification this year?
It won't quite be enough for that yet. However, the current print run is well above the 91,000 copies we published last year.
reached. You must also remember that Wemf measured 85,000 copies in 2001, so we have already made a big leap. Nevertheless, we will be careful not to be too euphoric.
In its current issue, the SonntagsZeitung concludes that the decline in sales is due to a loss of reach.
Rightly so?
This is wrong and misleading. Circulation and readership figures are often lumped together. We are talking about key figures that may or may not correlate. Subscription certification is due on April 1, and we will be among the winners there. However, we will have to wait until the fall to see the new readership figures.
The same article cites fewer pick-ups, i.e. declining readers-per-issue figures, as a further reason for the supposed dip in readership growth.
This is also technically incorrect. What is correct is that both circulation and reach increased after the format change. As a magazine, Weltwoche is therefore not only selling better, but is also being read by more people. We naturally hoped for and built on this double effect in the run-up to the relaunch.
Who decides on Roger Köppel's successor?
Ultimately, our CEO Filippo Leutenegger together with the Board of Directors.
The only basic maxim to which Köppel publicly subscribes is that
the truth about costs. So is a journalistic mastermind with a penchant for stretching budgets, such as Roger de Weck, out of the question from the outset?
I cannot comment on specific names in my role. But there's no question that we initially needed a journalistic messiah like Roger Köppel, whose recognized strengths such as originality and courage enabled him to live up to huge expectations. Without such a personality, we would not have achieved the turnaround. The successor can build on what has been achieved and benefits from the image of a winning title. His task is easier.
Interview:
In the blackAs CEO Filippo Leutenegger announced at a media conference, Jean Frey Verlag (Weltwoche, Beobachter, Bilanz, TR7) achieved a profit after tax of "a good 10 million francs" in 2003. This on a turnover of almost 100 million francs and an operating result of just under 10 million francs. The last annual financial statements of the previous owner, Basler Zeitung Medien, in mid-2002 still showed a
Loss of 12 million francs.
According to Leutenegger, this turnaround is due to his own
According to the information provided, almost two-thirds of this was due to the rigid cost-cutting measures in the areas of printing, personnel and IT. The rest was due to the increase in advertising and sales revenue at Weltwoche, the "excellent performance" of TR7 and the growing number of subscribers to the "still highly profitable" Beobachter. At the same time, the CEO denied all rumors of an imminent sale of Jean Frey and announced the imminent creation of an internal ombudsman's office. (oc)
With the Silvia Blocher interview, Weltwoche maneuvered itself into the SVP twilight.
Weltwoche publishing director Uli Rubner.
Oliver Classen
