Mirror, mirror …
Corporate Communications: Who produces the best annual report in the country? The magazine *Bilanz* recently named the top entries once again.
Corporate Communication: Who produces the most beautiful annual report in the country? The magazine *Bilanz* recently named the best ones once again. For the winners of this beauty contest, there are no advertising or sponsorship contracts, no car, and no opportunity to participate in global events to prove themselves to an international audience. The selection of the best annual report of the year is unspectacular. And unlike beauty pageants, this competition has, from the very beginning, been more about inner values than visual appeal. Like almost no other printed publication, an annual report conveys a company’s culture to the world—to all stakeholders. The means are images and typography; the tools are design, text, and, above all, numbers in the form of tables.For the past six years, *Die Bilanz* has sought to get to the bottom of this and has therefore conducted its own annual rating of annual reports. This year, too, annual reports (along with their websites) from companies based in Switzerland competed for the top spot in the October issue and underwent a three-stage evaluation. The companies that made it into the top 100 were featured in a ranking table, while the rest (ranks 101 through 186) had to settle for a box at the end of the article.
Eighteen experts from the fields of design and finance evaluated the 186 annual reports and websites. The specialists from Swiss communications agencies, who were responsible for evaluating the design, assessed a wide range of parameters such as «first impression,» «transparency,» «layout,» «visual concept,» «graphics,» «design of financial tables,» «typography,» and «technical implementation.».
The evaluation of the financial section—the value reporting—was conducted by a team from the Swiss Banking Institute. Under the direction of Professor Rudolf Volkart, five advanced economics students and a research assistant assessed the content based on 35 business management criteria. The evaluations of the annual report and the website were conducted independently of one another. The website ratings were performed by two experts in new media.
Honor to Whom Honor Is Due: Surprisingly, even the top-ranked companies failed to achieve a score of 4.5 in the category evaluations: With a score of 4.28, Swiss Re took first place in the «Most Informative» (Value Reporting) category. The jury was more generous in the «Most Visually Appealing» (Design) category: The energy company Axpo earned a score of 5.
Ultimately, what matters most is the overall ranking. Success here depends not only on the overall impression and the presentation of the report itself, but on a combination of both. Topping the podium in the overall ranking is the annual report of the pharmaceutical company Novartis. Although it ranked only 14th in design, its second-place finish in Value Reporting was decisive for the top spot. Furthermore, Novartis was the only company to rank in the top 15 in both categories.
The secret to the successful technical production of an annual report lies in the collaboration among the partners involved—namely, the company, the printing and post-press facility, and the agency. It is therefore conceivable that the success of the overall winner, Novartis, stemmed from the fact that all the companies are based in the same region: The printing company was Birkhäuser + GBC AG in Reinach, Basel-Landschaft, which specializes in producing annual reports; Com-Factory in Basel served as the agency; and even the paper came from nearby, from Ziegler Papier AG in Grellingen. Only in the case of the photographer—Nikos Economopoulos, a native of Greece who studied in Italy—does the globally active client appear to have made an exception to the concept of close collaboration.
Annual Reports: (Too) Often More Style Than Substance.
Gold for Novartis: The annual reports from Axpo, SBB, and Valora were named among the three best-designed reports in the 2004 Bilanz rating, all receiving the same grade. Swiss Re, Novartis, and Roche were apparently the most informative. The top three companies for their websites are Roche, Nestlé, and Unaxis.
Bronze in the overall standings went to the Valora Group, silver to Swiss Re, and gold to Novartis—if Olympic medals had been awarded.
The jury responsible for the design category was composed as follows: Jury Chair: Peter Vetter, Coande, Zurich; Jiri Chmelik, Hilda Design Matters, Zurich; Fritz Gottschalk, Gottschalk + Ash, Zurich; Gernot Honsel, Interbrand, Zurich; Flavia Mosele, Reflektor Visuelle Gestaltung, Lucerne; André Schneiter, Külling Partner Identity, Zurich; Thomas Wolfram, Wirz Identity, Zurich; Daniel Zehntner, Eclat, Erlenbach; Megi Zumstein, Bringolf Irion Vögeli, Zurich, and HGKL, Lucerne.
Jürgen Franck
Eighteen experts from the fields of design and finance evaluated the 186 annual reports and websites. The specialists from Swiss communications agencies, who were responsible for evaluating the design, assessed a wide range of parameters such as «first impression,» «transparency,» «layout,» «visual concept,» «graphics,» «design of financial tables,» «typography,» and «technical implementation.».
The evaluation of the financial section—the value reporting—was conducted by a team from the Swiss Banking Institute. Under the direction of Professor Rudolf Volkart, five advanced economics students and a research assistant assessed the content based on 35 business management criteria. The evaluations of the annual report and the website were conducted independently of one another. The website ratings were performed by two experts in new media.
Honor to Whom Honor Is Due: Surprisingly, even the top-ranked companies failed to achieve a score of 4.5 in the category evaluations: With a score of 4.28, Swiss Re took first place in the «Most Informative» (Value Reporting) category. The jury was more generous in the «Most Visually Appealing» (Design) category: The energy company Axpo earned a score of 5.
Ultimately, what matters most is the overall ranking. Success here depends not only on the overall impression and the presentation of the report itself, but on a combination of both. Topping the podium in the overall ranking is the annual report of the pharmaceutical company Novartis. Although it ranked only 14th in design, its second-place finish in Value Reporting was decisive for the top spot. Furthermore, Novartis was the only company to rank in the top 15 in both categories.
The secret to the successful technical production of an annual report lies in the collaboration among the partners involved—namely, the company, the printing and post-press facility, and the agency. It is therefore conceivable that the success of the overall winner, Novartis, stemmed from the fact that all the companies are based in the same region: The printing company was Birkhäuser + GBC AG in Reinach, Basel-Landschaft, which specializes in producing annual reports; Com-Factory in Basel served as the agency; and even the paper came from nearby, from Ziegler Papier AG in Grellingen. Only in the case of the photographer—Nikos Economopoulos, a native of Greece who studied in Italy—does the globally active client appear to have made an exception to the concept of close collaboration.
Annual Reports: (Too) Often More Style Than Substance.
Gold for Novartis: The annual reports from Axpo, SBB, and Valora were named among the three best-designed reports in the 2004 Bilanz rating, all receiving the same grade. Swiss Re, Novartis, and Roche were apparently the most informative. The top three companies for their websites are Roche, Nestlé, and Unaxis.
Bronze in the overall standings went to the Valora Group, silver to Swiss Re, and gold to Novartis—if Olympic medals had been awarded.
The jury responsible for the design category was composed as follows: Jury Chair: Peter Vetter, Coande, Zurich; Jiri Chmelik, Hilda Design Matters, Zurich; Fritz Gottschalk, Gottschalk + Ash, Zurich; Gernot Honsel, Interbrand, Zurich; Flavia Mosele, Reflektor Visuelle Gestaltung, Lucerne; André Schneiter, Külling Partner Identity, Zurich; Thomas Wolfram, Wirz Identity, Zurich; Daniel Zehntner, Eclat, Erlenbach; Megi Zumstein, Bringolf Irion Vögeli, Zurich, and HGKL, Lucerne.
Jürgen Franck
