VSW Advertising Statistics In mid-February, the January data from the VSW advertising statistics will be published using the new system. WEMF Director Marco Bernasconi explains why another change had become necessary.
WW: Four years ago, the advertising statistics were redesigned, and now another change is already underway. Why? Marco Bernasconi: In recent years, there have been various consolidations among publishers, leading to the emergence of sometimes complex flagship newspaper systems, and the launch of Sunday editions. All of this repeatedly led to differences in interpretation when reporting the data. To prevent this, the Swiss Press Association formed a project group chaired by Jürg Weber, managing director of the Neue Luzerner Zeitung, which made various clarifications to the regulations. The aim was to restore the advertising statistics to a basis that is credible and transparent and also ensures continuity.
Will there be a currency break? Yes, the new data is no longer directly comparable to the previous data.
But the last currency change was only four years ago. Yes, it coincided with the introduction of the Advertising Index Switzerland (AIS). At the time, however, no one could have anticipated that the AIS would be discontinued so soon. As a result, we had to revamp our advertising statistics.
Speaking of the currency change: Will the data from January 2008 be comparable to the January data from 2007 and 2006? Not with the 2006 data, no. But it will be with the 2007 data. That’s because we’ve back-adjusted the data for one year. So we’ve processed all the data from 2007 using both the old and the new systems to ensure a certain degree of comparability.
So there will be two data sets for 2007: one that has already been published and is comparable to previous years (through 2004), and a second data set that will now be published and updated month by month along with the figures for 2008. Correct.
When the system was changed four years ago, there were also parallel statistics, but that led to confusion. How will you prevent that from happening again? By ensuring that the data currently available for 2007 will no longer appear automatically starting in mid-February. In the statistics, January 2008 will only be compared to January 2007 under the new system. And if you want to analyze the 2007 data, a comparison with 2006 will not be possible. However, like all data since 1990, the existing 2007 data will remain available for manual retrieval and analysis in the online system. It should also be noted that there are some publications for which the 2007 data could not be converted to the new system. This applies, for example, to the *Basler Zeitung* and the TV program guides that were transferred from Ringier to Axel Springer Switzerland. In these cases, neither 2007 data will be published nor will a year-over-year comparison be included. We will indicate this with a footnote in the statistics.
A survey of publishers conducted by *Werbewoche* shows that, overall, there is little trust in today’s advertising statistics. Will this now change? That is the stated goal of WEMF and Jürg Weber, who is overseeing this process.
Five of the 14 survey responses stated that the statistics did not match the reported figures. Three others suspected that the competitors’ data should be questioned. Why should this situation improve now? We have contacted many publishers, closely examined their discrepancies, and made corrections where necessary. Based on a detailed analysis of the identified discrepancies, we have taken all necessary measures to improve accuracy. In particular, clarifications in the regulations and in the audits and consultations conducted by WEMF have ensured that publishers enter data in a consistent manner. Furthermore, we have determined that many discrepancies arise because different definitions are used in publishers’ internal statistics.
For about two years, the figures from the *Basler Zeitung* were incomplete—a situation the publisher deliberately allowed to continue. Will there be sanctions for such cases in the future? No, we can only reach out to the publishers and work with them to find a solution. This is because advertising statistics are not comparable to circulation audits, whose data are also communicated to the public. In that case, sanctions are necessary to prevent abuse. Advertising statistics, on the other hand, are a tool for the industry to identify trends and measure its own performance.
Should a publisher notify you if they believe the competition’s figures are incorrect? Sure. As with circulation certification, we rely on people reporting such observations to us. But we also ask questions on our own initiative as soon as a change seems implausible to us.
We keep hearing that self-published titles are a source of error. This is because publishers of self-published titles must report their data individually, whereas data for P-license titles comes uniformly from the MIS computer system. It is true that publishers work with different computer systems. But large in-house publishers, in particular, have also automated their data processing. We have reviewed these systems. However, it is clear that statistics can never be perfect. That is why we continually seek dialogue with the people responsible for advertising statistics at the publishers. We take care to ensure that the interpretations of the regulations are applied as uniformly as possible. I believe the margin of error will be in the per mille range.
According to the survey, there is still some uncertainty regarding the calculation of the new monthly net sales figures. One thing is clear: discounts are deducted, but not the consultant commission. And what about direct-booking discounts or retroactive charges? In the monthly statistics, we cannot account for retroactive charges. I therefore expect certain differences compared to the annual net advertising statistics. The direct-booking discount, on the other hand, has not yet been discussed in the working group. But the same principle likely applies to it as to additional charges.
Let’s stick with the annual net advertising statistics: Will they be essentially comparable to the new monthly net figures—essentially as the sum of the monthly data? No, the advertising statistics are more comprehensive. For example, in the case of a newspaper with a flagship publication system, they also include the local revenue of the flagship publications, whereas these are not included in the classified ad statistics. In addition, the advertising statistics include significantly more titles from the trade and specialty press category. The ad placement statistics, on the other hand, primarily include Q-publications. The scopes of the two net statistics therefore differ.
Are the new net figures comparable to the gross figures from Mediafocus (MF)? Not at all. This is because MF deliberately excludes part of the volume. Classified ads and small ads are not measured. When viewed in Swiss francs, the differences are even greater, because MF applies a gross page rate for the entire publication. Combination discounts or local rates are not taken into account.
What’s the general situation: Do publications have to participate in the advertising statistics? And do they pay anything for it? Publishers participate on a voluntary basis, but they do have to pay a fee. Since these are industry statistics, every publisher should actually have an interest in participating. After all, the industry is interested in having valid data. The Swiss Press Association also considers this important. Of course, it takes a bit of persuasion here and there. But after all, there’s no need to publish confidential data.
Interview: Markus Knöpfli
Advertisement Statistics—What’s Actually Changing: In general, all advertisements subject to value-added tax are counted—including those resulting from barter transactions, sponsorships, or investment funds. Although these were already included in the past, uncertainty arose time and again because they were not mentioned in the old regulations.
In terms of volume, the biggest change likely involves advertisements and brochure inserts for other publishing properties (print, radio, TV, online) from the same media company. Previously, these were considered in-house advertisements and were counted in full. Under the new rules, however, such advertisements are counted only if the company holds no more than a 50 percent stake in the publication. If the stake exceeds 50 percent, they are considered in-house advertisements and are no longer counted.
There is also a change in the categories: From now on, only real estate and job listings will be listed separately; the «Other» category (obituaries, classifieds, and adult ads), on the other hand, will be included under “Commercial” effective immediately.
A change has been introduced for job supplements such as Alpha or NZZExecutive, which are included with both the daily and Sunday editions of newspapers. These are now reported separately, and it is up to the user of the statistics to decide which category to assign the volume to. The advertising statistics now also include net revenue by title group. However, revenue by individual title cannot be derived.
The new regulations are available for download on the WEMF website (
). (mk)