Here comes luxury journalism
Journalism America's publishers are looking for new financing models for quality journalism.
Journalism America's publishers are looking for new financing models for quality journalism.
Most newspaper publishers in the USA are not doing well economically. The available funds are being used to report on the most important current developments. International reporting and especially investigative journalism are increasingly seen as a luxury that many can no longer afford, so they are looking for alternative funding methods. One of these is the Pro Publica project in New York, which was penned by former Wall Street Journal editor-in-chief Paul Steiger and is dedicated exclusively to investigative research. The unusual project is financed by a foundation set up by US billionaires Herb and Marion Sandler, who are considered liberal and have provided ten million dollars a year for the first three years. They want to promote revealing journalism without interfering in reporting. 25 reporters and editors, many of them renowned former investigative reporters from the New York Times or the Washington Post, are on the payroll of the new company. The Pro Publica stories will be published free of charge in major national media such as the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal and the television magazine 60 Minutes in order to achieve the broadest possible impact.
Industry observers welcome the project. "I like the idea of doing investigative research as part of an independent non-profit organization," says Patrick Philips, professor of journalism at New York University. "That doesn't necessarily mean that all investigative research in the future has to be incorporated into such a model to ensure the survival of the genre. As long as readers are interested, traditional media outlets will continue to fund it."
Necessary alternativesInvestigative journalism is also promoted in the USA by other organizations such as the Pulitzer Center for Crisis Reporting or the Fund for Independence in Journalism, both of which are funded by public foundations and award grants to media organizations for relevant research. In contrast, the non-profit organization Kansas Health Institute is dedicated to targeted reporting on regional health policy. Such initiatives are seen as necessary alternatives to ensure the quality of journalism. "A greater role for non-profit organizations could help all media," believes Geneva Overholser, author of the Manifesto for Change, a guide to the journalism of the future from the Annenberg Public Policy Center.
Another way to save costs for publishers is the concept of user-generated content. The principle that the users of a medium also provide the content has long been practiced on online sites such as YouTube. Print publishers are following suit: the magazine publisher 8020 Publishing in San Francisco, for example, publishes two glossy magazines whose content is provided entirely by readers. The publishing house has only 19 employees: editors and sales staff, but no reporters. Both the photography magazine Jpeg and the travel magazine Everywhere live from readers' pictures and texts: they post their photos on a website where users select the best ones, which are then published in the print edition. The photographers receive a hundred dollar fee and an annual subscription.
There is mistrustThe founder of the publishing house, Halsey Minor, was also the founder of Cnet. He believes that any hobby can be turned into a magazine, for example food and cars - topics that could soon appear in the form of user-generated magazines. Traditional media makers view the model with suspicion, as it could cost them their jobs. "In some cases, such user-generated media are useful for readers," comments Sree Sreenivasan, communications professor at Columbia University in New York. "But you lose stories that you only get to read when an editor is looking for them."
Gerti Schön, New York
