Marc Walder is set to become the new managing director of Ringier Switzerland. In an interview with *Werbewoche*, he spoke about the newly formed executive board—which includes no women—his potential successor at *Sonntagsblick*, and the fact that his editors-in-chief must also have a keen eye for business. Werbewoche: Mr. Walder, you are moving from your roles as editor-in-chief and editorial director of Sonntagsblick to the position of managing director of Ringier Switzerland. What appeals to you about this role? Marc Walder: Over the past ten years, the work of an editor-in-chief has changed significantly: It has shifted from traditional newspaper production toward strategic planning and the integration of commercial aspects. I’ve already taken on this role to some extent in my previous position and have realized that it interests me greatly. However, I will continue to cultivate journalism in the future. In publishing, people often distinguish between «number people» and «word people»—I don’t want to make that distinction for myself. When was the official decision made for you to take on this job? The Board of Directors approved the corresponding proposal last Thursday.
A newly formed executive board is taking office at the same time you are. Why was its composition changed? Two aspects were very important to me: that the executive board be small and consist of people who remain actively involved in operations. Going forward, we’ll have five divisions: the Blick Group, Magazines, Ringier Romandie, New Media, and Services. That’s relatively few for a media company the size of Ringier. And I’ve staffed these divisions with people who are involved in day-to-day operations and who must continue to prove themselves anew every day.
Did you put together the new management team? Yes. It was a process that had been underway for some time. The reorganization was initially planned by a small group and then refined by Ringier CEO Martin Werfeli and me.
What will your relationship be like with Daniel Pillard, who served as interim CEO of Ringier Switzerland for a year and remains a member of the executive board? Daniel Pillard has always emphasized that he is serving in this role on an interim basis. Because Ringier Switzerland’s main focus in recent months has been on the Blick Group, we’ve been in very close contact. In the process, Daniel Pillard has become a good colleague of mine.
Why isn’t there a single woman on the new executive board? That’s a good question. I was just talking about gender issues at a dinner recently, and I’m firmly convinced that it’s crucial for a company to include women. Not for the sake of quotas, but in its own best interest. I certainly enjoyed working well with many women at Schweizer Illustrierte. At the moment, however, there is simply no woman at Ringier who is a candidate for the executive board. On the other hand, we do have several female department heads and editors-in-chief.
Will you also be the one to choose your successor as editor-in-chief of Sonntagsblick? I will make a recommendation and ask the group management to approve it. The search for a successor has already begun, and we hope to complete the process quickly.
Is Hannes Britschgi, who has been deputy editor-in-chief since April, a possibility? He is a possibility, as are a few others. However, it would be wrong to assume that the race is already over and that Hannes Britschgi is a shoo-in anyway.
In the future, you’ll be directly overseeing the editors-in-chief. What does that mean in practice—should the editors-in-chief expect you to constantly interfere with their work? I’m not known for interfering with editors-in-chief—after all, I held that position myself for long enough. But I also know how lonely it can be to be the editor-in-chief of a major publication. That’s why I want to support and advise the editors-in-chief, but of course also point out when a publication is heading in the wrong direction.
Will editors-in-chief have to pay closer attention to commercial interests in the future? Anyone who doesn't also take the commercial interests of their publication into account today is not a good editor-in-chief. Editors-in-chief must ensure that their publication remains attractive to both readers and advertisers.
This also carries risks. We have very clear guidelines regarding the editorial independence of our publications. The independence of the editorial teams must be guaranteed; otherwise, it would be impossible to produce titles like *Blick* or *Sonntagsblick*. It must always be possible to publish critical articles about companies that are advertising clients. However, an editor-in-chief must have a good sense of whether his publication is also well-positioned commercially.
This is exemplified by *Blick am Abend*. *Blick am Abend* is my latest project—it’s three weeks old and has gotten off to a great start. As a free newspaper, it has a different business model. Its journalistic credo is to target a young, urban audience. The fact that consumer and lifestyle topics play such a prominent role stems from the concept: as an evening newspaper, *Blick am Abend* aims to present the world from a positive perspective.
What are your goals for Ringier Switzerland? I’d rather not discuss that at the moment. I won’t be taking up my new position until September; it would be irresponsible of me to talk about strategy this early. Suffice it to say: We will first develop a national strategy and then break it down into the individual divisions. We intend to do this as quickly as possible.
To put it another way: What do you consider good journalism, and what does Ringier need to offer its readers? That’s a very general question, so you’ll get a general answer. In my view, good journalism must present all information in a way that makes it easy to understand. At the same time, good journalism should be enjoyable and offer more than one might expect.
In closing: Peter Rothenbühler wrote that Ringier Switzerland is run personally by its owner, like a princely court. So are you the new count? I read that comment about the princely court, too (laughs). Seriously, though: I’ve seen the inner workings of many publishing houses over the past few years, and Ringier compares very favorably: clear structures, professional organization. It’s an advantage that the company isn’t publicly traded but is family-owned. That gives us more freedom. I see my role here as a coach, trainer, and motivator. I want to be both a challenger and a supporter.
Interview: Carole Scheidegger