Customer loyalty with mobile advertising works best on premium editorial websites
A new study by Teads shows that video ads create a stronger incentive to buy within articles than in social media feeds and on video platforms.

Teads, the inventor of outstream video advertising and a global monetization platform for publishers, published a new eye-tracking study on Tuesday. According to the study, advertising placed within premium editorial content leads to a 27 percent increase in consumer purchase intent. In addition, the scroll rate on premium websites slows down, allowing users to perceive more concentrated content. This also increases the chance of attracting users' attention with attractive advertising formats.
This insight comes at a time when advertisers are questioning the quality of attention that can be expected from advertising in social media and video environments.
Teads showed 115 participants different commercials on a range of different mobile websites on their smartphones. Mobile HD eye-trackers were used to determine user perception and reaction as well as engagement with the advertising material in the different content environments. Following the eye-tracking phase, a survey was conducted to obtain relevant information on the effectiveness of the advertising. You can see the eye-tracking session in action here.
Tead's eye-tracking study shows that premium editorial environments and the context of an ad are decisive for the success of a campaign.
Other noteworthy findings:
Scroll speed is decisive: Users scroll 50 percent more in social feeds, which leads to a higher speed and therefore less attention for advertising. On premium editorial sites, users act slower, scroll less and read significantly more than on social media. As a result, video campaigns have a greater chance of being noticed in a slower, more focused environment than when embedded in fast-paced social media environments.
The content environment influences the advertising view: Almost nine out of ten users watch video ads within articles, while six out of ten users watch video ads in social feeds.
Dwell time on the video: Promotional videos in articles are viewed 24 percent longer than those in social feeds.
Longer reading time increases engagement: Consumers spend 80 percent of their time reading on publisher sites, compared to 65 percent on social media. Users are 23 percent more likely to read content in high-quality articles than in social feeds.
Millennials have a higher recall of native advertising: As young people have grown up with digital media, they are less surprised by native advertising and have a greater cognitive capacity to absorb rapidly changing content in parallel. Millennials are twice as likely to remember native video advertising than those over 40.
"With the rise of mobile, advertisers have an endless, vast choice of content environments to reach their target audience, which inevitably leads to the question of which are the best to engage the user," says Bertrand Quesada, CEO of Teads. "This study proves that premium editorial sites are the most effective place for brands to advertise and promises a relaxed, engaged user who is guaranteed to bring greater focus and attention to advertising."

Further information on the Teads eye-tracking study and graphics can be found at here (PDF).
















