SVP received media support
A Fög study presented to Schweiz am Sonntag shows which media reported on the immigration initiative and how. However, the Tages-Anzeiger is questioning its leading pro position.
The Research Institute for the Public Sphere and Society (Fög) analyzed the reporting of six selected newspapers on the SVP's immigration initiative in recent months. The results show that the Tages-Anzeiger newspaper, which is considered to be left-liberal, has the largest pro overhang: out of a total of 76 published articles, 51 reported in favor of the initiative (pro overhang: +13). A second Tamedia medium, 20 Minuten, also had more positive than negative publications (pro overhang +3).
According to the study, Le Temps (number of articles: 115, negative overhang: -29), NZZ (98/-38) and Blick (49/-24) positioned themselves against the initiative. Fög director Kurt Imhof told Schweiz am Sonntag that support for the initiative has been growing in recent weeks, and that there is a "low level of reflection on the effects" and a "lack of an enlightened horizon". The frequent criticism voiced in reader comments that politicians and the media are playing down the problems of immigration has led to "overcompensation in the description of the problem".
The Tages-Anzeiger denies the pro-course to Schweiz am Sonntag. According to Daniel Foppa, Head of Domestic Affairs, addressing the problems is not the same as taking a Yes position. In addition, the methodology of the study is "adventurous". However, he confirms that there were pro votes within the editorial team - a first for an SVP initiative. However, the majority of the editorial team were clearly against the initiative.
Kurt Imhof also explains the growing media skepticism towards immigration by saying that media professionals are themselves plagued by fears of decline due to the "rapid deterioration of their career prospects". A thesis that is also supported in the article by Das Magazin author Daniel Binswanger: Journalists are confronted with a real decline in their standard of living, which has reduced their immunity to SVP rhetoric. The personal consternation has caused important counter-arguments to fade into the background. (SaS/hae)



























