"Brave new TV world!?"
The Zurich Advertising Club and Publisuisse hosted a discussion on new forms of television
"I already said you must have fallen into a ratings hole," joked Peter Schellenberg when Jürg Wildberger arrived five minutes late at the panel discussion in Zurich's Renaissance Hotel. "Schälli" was retrospectively introduced by the moderator Reto Kammermann from the Zurich Advertising Club as a "crime writer and commissioned filmmaker for the German Armed Forces and director of SF DRS since January 1, 1988".
This irony took on a deeper meaning when Wildberger's career path was then zapped through with "'Kassensturz', 'Netto', Editor-in-Chief Business Channel, '10 vor 10', Program Officer SF DRS, Editor-in-Chief Facts and now TV 3 with 'Big Brother'".
Unlike many previous panels about the fraternal dispute in the Swiss TV scene, however, the panel discussion developed in a pleasantly objective atmosphere. Some participants found it a pity that Schellenberg only wanted to take part in this event if he did not have to discuss in the presence of Roger Schawinski. Andy Lehmann from Optimedia expressed his regret about this. And so the discussion was somewhat one-sided, focusing mainly on the achievements of TV 3.
The fourth on the podium, Matthias Luchsinger from Cinecom, attested to Jürg Wildberger's "absolutely professional marketing" of his channel. "You can tell that he studied economics. Even in his cross-media strategies," said the media specialist.
Fortunately, you can't copy SRG
The head of TV 3 immediately felt challenged: "After three years, we have achieved a market share of ten percent," he said, citing current ratings. And then Wildberger made what was probably the most important statement of this discussion on the keyword "building a journalistic alternative in Switzerland" when he qualified: "In terms of content, we are not quite broadcasting what we wanted to do a year ago. But TV 3 today is certainly very different from what we will be in two years' time!"
The jazz musician with a talent for improvisation compared the situation with the development of RTL. Freely commented: 'Even at RTL, the fruits of the development work are showing more today than "Tutti Frutti" did back then.
"We used to always have to say we were good. Today you can see it!" Peter Schellenberg remarked on the new competitive situation. The personnel market has changed just as positively. There is more rotation among journalists and presenters. "Our problem used to be that people didn't want to leave. Today, not everyone wants to stay with Swiss television until they're 65," Schellenberg said happily, without specifying whether these SRG fossils, who had previously been fed for years, were more likely to migrate to Tele 24 or TV 3.
Schellenberg formulated the strategy for his channels as "consistency and maintenance of the label". He does not want to jump into new forms, even if the "Millionärsshow" would admittedly be an ideal replacement for "Benissimo". But with Endemol, Schellenberg would have "a bit of a problem working together. His telephone polls are a rip-off!"
And apart from that, the emergence of the new German private broadcasters would have provoked some creative thinking at the time. "Similar competitors have no chance of copying SRG," said the director of SF DRS. And had to put up with the remark that Schawinski should probably be excluded here for the well-known reasons.
Media planning is more serious than TV program planning
Despite a friendship with Wildberger that is still palpable, Schellenberg did not hide the fact that he also finds certain developments at TV 3 anything but good. With regard to the repeatedly and proudly cited multimedia achievements with simultaneous free TV, Internet and SMS on "Big Brother", the old 68er put this cross-media revolution into perspective with his reservations: "If a woman who is avowedly averse to alcohol is deliberately drunk in the container - and then it is announced via SMS that you can watch her vomiting in the toilet on the Internet, then as program director I don't want to take responsibility for such new content."
With his own pithiness, Schellenberg described private broadcasters as "paternoster television": you can get on and off a trend whenever you want. "And just like the paternoster, a new trend is always guaranteed to follow," added Lehmann.
However, the media man wanted to give the private TV providers the
The advertising industry can react to such rapid and usually short-lived trends in a similarly spontaneous manner. Professional media planning works with long-term strategies; if a new program on TV 3 suddenly has three percent more market share, the media placement cannot simply immediately place three percent more customer money around this new program, explained the Managing Director of Optimedia.
The same money is being spread across more and more channels. "So will more advertising be cheaper?" asked Reto Kammermann in the episode. Wildberger replied indirectly: "Viewers are used to the quality of the German channels. But they have five times more money per minute than we do." Large budgets must therefore be replaced with ingenuity if, for example, "Big Brother" Switzerland with only four people still wants to bring an equivalent or even better product to the screen than RTL with its 16 permanently employed container keepers.
In Switzerland, only eleven percent of the CHF 350 million in TV advertising money goes to private television, and the trend is rising. Wildberger therefore calculates that, with a "normal" distribution formula as in the rest of Europe, one day there should be money for at least two private broadcasters here too without any problems.
SF DRS could, but does not want to interrupt "Benissimo"
Lehmann countered that people in Spain also spend much more time in front of the television with four hours a day. "With the new lunchtime program on SF 1, a change is on the horizon," Peter Schellenberg tried to reassure the electronic media planners. As long as the usage time of the brave new TV world does not increase, it is an illusion to think of greater advertising revenue. "SRG is relatively sold out in prime time," the former monopolist revealed. The problem is also the restrictions on interstitial advertising.
According to the law, "Benissimo" could be interrupted in the middle, and Andy Lehmann could also "immediately sell" this new advertising option to his customers. Nevertheless, Schellenberg does not want to interrupt it "for image reasons". At least not until the new radio and television law is signed and sealed, as the tactician from Leutschenbach finally revealed in an aside.
Incidentally, interruptive advertising is the suicide of quality television. In southern European countries, where much more money is invested in TV advertising, the medium of television is increasingly being used just like radio. In the USA, the trend is actually such that people are once again listening to the radio much more than watching television.
TV 3 will soon have no sand
more under your feet
With the telling statement that SF DRS has only one permanently employed lawyer, while ZDF has 36, Schellenberg was able to credibly justify his television vision: "We are competitors in the market. But privately, we don't want to get involved in senseless price gouging!"
SF DRS could invent the "Millionaire Show" itself more cheaply anyway instead of buying it in. When asked why it hadn't been done long ago, the Leutschenbacher said: "You know that there have been certain changes in our entertainment department!"
Looking to the future, Wildberger believes that the upcoming formats will probably involve a mixture of reality and fiction. "You only have one format in ever new variations," countered Schellenberg. Even if it is also difficult to stand out independently when, for example, the "Millionaire Show" has to be broadcast in the same style everywhere, Schellenberg does not wish for the demise of TV 3. "Tamedia television is a good customer of the studio facilities in our tpc."
Wildberger reassured: "We bring the new things that are popular - and we do it in dialect." As a result, he is no longer standing on sand, but "can already feel the ground under his feet", summarized the head of TV3.
PS: If you, as an advertiser, have not been completely delighted by these lines, here is a word of consolation from Peter Schellenberg: "I think many commercials are well made. But advertisers are a rarely masochistic bunch. Advertisers in particular always say their work is just garbage."
