In TV-crazy North America, the fun-filled "TV Turnoff Week" has paradoxically long since acquired cult status. This year, the boycott action, which will take place for the eighth time next week, even enjoys government support. In Europe, however, advertising and media critics still find it difficult to accept such collective abstinence.
Two subversive commercials are running on CNN these days. One shows nothing more than a black matte screen with a running clock that displays the incessantly passing time of life. The punch line of the 30-second image breakdown is: "Don't waist any more of your time. Turn your TV off - now, and at least for one week."
In the other Adbusters spot (see article on page 15), we see a snub-nosed girl huddled in front of the flicker box, watching a thoroughly representative U.S. program with ever-larger eyes. In the midst of the purchase requests, cannon thunder and bed moans, a sonorous voice from off-screen finally asks: "Where does she get her social understanding of her role? Who teaches her values and worldview? Whose child is she, yours or the TV stations'?" Since any answer is superfluous in view of the fascinated young viewer, the subsequent appeal is not without effect: "Take responsibility for your children. Done funny - done watching TV."
Even more remarkable than these two insistent "uncommercials" is the fact that CNN is broadcasting them at all. Until the year before last, all attempts by the highly professional anti-advertisers to buy timeslots on the major American networks for their "TV Turnoff Week," launched in 1994 and taking place this year from April 22 to 28, failed.
Even the Minister of Health shuts down for a week
In the short term, according to Adbusters founder Kalle Lasn, the campaign, which has since become an alternative social ritual, is intended to bring about "a noticeable reduction in viewer ratings"; the long-term goal, however, is "to raise the quality of life and self-determination of our media-infested fellow human beings". No wonder, then, that ABC, CBS and NBC have so far steadfastly refused to allow these Trojan horses to enter their commercial block race tracks.
But even in Europe, where British, French and Scandinavian activists in particular are advertising "TV Turnoff Week" via the Internet and flyers, Lasn and his mostly volunteer comrades-in-arms have so far been rebuffed with their "Uncommercials.
The fact that this lockout strategy (which, it should be noted, violates the right to freedom of expression) is counterproductive in the long run is shown by the growing number of North Americans who follow the call for abstinence precisely because of this boycott, which is of course made public by Adbusters. This year, even the U.S. Secretary of Health and Human Services is showing solidarity with "Greenpeace for the Head" (self-advertisement) - for purely public health reasons, of course. After all, in the "couch-potato" nation of the USA, overweight and obesity rank second among the most frequent preventable causes of death.
Excessive TV consumption - in the average American household, the flicker box is on for more than seven (!) hours a day - also has psychological collective consequences. The most relevant for the media society, but at the same time also the most controversial, is the increased use of violence by TV junkies. Additional water on this mill of TV critics was recently directed by a proof in the renowned science magazine Science that TV consumption and willingness to use violence are "directly proportional" among adult US citizens. Even if this correlation seems somewhat polemical and sweeping, the fact is that a twelve-year-old in the land of unlimited opportunity has seen an average of over 17,000 screen deaths.
More controlled dispensing of the number one popular drug?
In our country, this figure and the associated pressure to suffer and act is (still) significantly lower. For this reason, television boycotts have not been a serious issue in German-speaking countries since the seventies, when they were critical in all social issues. The last prominent politician in our latitudes to publicly advocate a more controlled release of the people's number one drug was Helmut Schmidt.
His "Plea for a TV-free Day" of 1978 triggered a hurricane of indignation at the time, before the liberalization of the media market. Actors, trade unionists and, above all, budding TV entrepreneurs vehemently resisted such a culturally pessimistic attitude and superintendent-like paternalism. The former German chancellor and current co-editor of the weekly newspaper Die Zeit, however, was not impressed by this and continued to warn undauntedly - and with wise foresight for the Murdochs and Berlusconis of this world - against this "medium with which future Caesars will dig themselves into people's souls.
But even in Switzerland, TV skeptics do not yet have a significant political lobby. And this despite the fact that one of the few avowed TV abstainers is Christoph Blocher. His reasoning ("I'm not going to let just anyone talk into my living room") sounds, as usual, a bit simple, but for once quite plausible.
That is also the opinion of Bernhard Chiquet, a media educator from Basel. He is one of the few official Swiss participants in this year's worldwide switch-off campaign, listed in the online activist directory of adbus ters.org. "More and more mothers and fathers are resigning themselves in the face of their children's screen addiction. With this voluntary, playful food for thought, I would like to try to sensitize my students and their parents to this problem," he says.
To this end, Chiquet has announced a kind of abstinence competition within the school. The winner - in good educational tradition - will receive a book voucher. This idea has long since been expanded into a nationwide program in America. Its name is "More reading, less TV. Its sponsor is the Internet-based "TV Turnoff Network" foundation.
More anti-TV sites:
www.tvturnoff.org
(USA)
www.whitedot.org
(United Kingdom)
www.antipub.net
(France)
www.uschi-braun.de
(Germany)