Less is more
Noteworthy: The current reduction in ads and articles is having a decidedly positive impact on readers. After all, thinner newspapers are better newspapers.
Column The current diet of advertisements and articles is having positive consequences for readers. Because thinner newspapers are better newspapers: Because advertising revenues have collapsed like never before, the savings commissioners are ruling the publishing houses. The industry is moaning and one sector is feeling sorry for itself. The topic has already found so many chroniclers that we can keep quiet about it here. Instead, let's ask how readers are experiencing the crisis in their daily or weekly newspapers. Anyone who reads one of the quality national German newspapers, for example, will have noticed that they finish reading it more quickly these days. The paper has become much thinner. But even readers in the new Germany of cheapskates and bargain hunters seem to take this in their stride, even though they are now getting less for the same money. One editor-in-chief even reports letters and phone calls in which subscribers breathe a sigh of relief that they now prefer to read the newspaper. They no longer have the guilty conscience that the sometimes oak-thick printed matter had previously instilled in them. Who could really use political sections of twelve to sixteen pages or even a feuilleton that spread over eight pages a day? The slimmer product makes it easier to make a selection and places clearer islands of significance in the sea of information. And it reduces reading time to a reasonable level again.
We want to praise the crisis for this effect: it is forcing newspaper publishers and editorial offices to
to think about their "core business". In the boom times, many
The expansion in size is not primarily due to journalistic intentions, but only to the interest in surrounding the huge advertising plantation with a journalistic screen. Malicious tongues have described the FAZ as the "largest job exchange in the republic", which the editorial team had to "cloak as comfortably as possible". And these coats got more and more pockets: Pompous "capital" pages, playgrounds for intellectual dalliances and with
Lifestyle supplements stuffed with chic trivia absorbed part of the scarce resource of attention. In feature pages, even provincial trivialities were declared objects of national interest. The infamous printing of genome formulas over many pages in the feature section of the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung was the unsurpassable highlight of this senseless waste of newspaper pages.
This nonsense is now a thing of the past. If you only have five pages left for politics, you have to think carefully about which event the newspaper can inform the multimedia-informed reader about in such a way that they really learn something new and important. The cultural sections have also become quieter. If the available space is already filled with reliable information and reasoned judgment about a clever book, a moving film or an exciting play, it is no longer possible to start one of those unbearable "debates" that many feature pages have been preoccupied with in recent years. It looks as if readers appreciate the fact that the slimmer newspapers have lost a lot of ballast, but have gained in clarity and orientation. In times of media information overkill, these are key benefits of quality newspapers. In this sense, the thinner newspaper is the better one. Hopefully this will not be forgotten once the current crisis is over.
> Heribert Seifert is the media and culture correspondent for the Neue Zürcher Zeitung and lives as a freelance journalist in northern Germany.
We want to praise the crisis for this effect: it is forcing newspaper publishers and editorial offices to
to think about their "core business". In the boom times, many
The expansion in size is not primarily due to journalistic intentions, but only to the interest in surrounding the huge advertising plantation with a journalistic screen. Malicious tongues have described the FAZ as the "largest job exchange in the republic", which the editorial team had to "cloak as comfortably as possible". And these coats got more and more pockets: Pompous "capital" pages, playgrounds for intellectual dalliances and with
Lifestyle supplements stuffed with chic trivia absorbed part of the scarce resource of attention. In feature pages, even provincial trivialities were declared objects of national interest. The infamous printing of genome formulas over many pages in the feature section of the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung was the unsurpassable highlight of this senseless waste of newspaper pages.
This nonsense is now a thing of the past. If you only have five pages left for politics, you have to think carefully about which event the newspaper can inform the multimedia-informed reader about in such a way that they really learn something new and important. The cultural sections have also become quieter. If the available space is already filled with reliable information and reasoned judgment about a clever book, a moving film or an exciting play, it is no longer possible to start one of those unbearable "debates" that many feature pages have been preoccupied with in recent years. It looks as if readers appreciate the fact that the slimmer newspapers have lost a lot of ballast, but have gained in clarity and orientation. In times of media information overkill, these are key benefits of quality newspapers. In this sense, the thinner newspaper is the better one. Hopefully this will not be forgotten once the current crisis is over.
> Heribert Seifert is the media and culture correspondent for the Neue Zürcher Zeitung and lives as a freelance journalist in northern Germany.
