The CLA as a bargaining chip
Press Council Publishers and the SRG cannot (yet) join the Press Council. The journalists' associations have postponed their decision until next spring.
Press Council Publishers and the SRG cannot (yet) join the Press Council. The journalists' associations have postponed their decision until next spring.
The Impressum professional association recently decided on November 16, the Comedia trade union's press and electronic media sector committee at the end of October: the decision on whether to include publishers and the SRG on the Press Council's foundation board will be made in spring 2008 at the earliest. According to Impressum secretary Mathieu Fleury, the reason for the postponement is the only provisional result of the negotiations with the SRG. Time is not of the essence, he continues: "The great danger was a no vote."
The unresolved SRG positions were also a topic of discussion at Comedia, as Comedia Central Secretary Stephanie Vonarburg explains. However, time is still needed to rebuild the culture of discussion and trust with the publishers. This reminds her of the obstacle that has always plagued the negotiations on the inclusion of publishers in the Press Council: the lack of a collective labor agreement (CLA). Under the leadership of President Hanspeter Lebrument, the Swiss Press Publishers Association terminated the CLA in August 2004 and then only wanted to conduct negotiations under conditions that were unacceptable to the employee organizations.
This is because Impressum also insists on social partnership agreements. At the last delegates' meeting in May 2007, several voters demanded that publishers must first agree to a CLA. Former Impressum co-president Antoine Gessler, for example, declared at the time: "Impressum's position is clear: we don't want any publishers on the Board of Trustees until a CLA has been signed." The resolution passed at the time was a little more restrained: a credible commitment to professional ethics requires "a firm commitment to working conditions based on social partnership". This means: "A serious willingness to negotiate CLAs."
In the meantime, however, the positions have converged. The five years of negotiations on the Press Council changed the atmosphere. Mathieu Fleury says: "We arrived at a new culture of discussion." However, he then qualifies: "A CLA is not yet an issue." Stephanie Vonarburg shares this positive assessment; for her, too, the talks are "not yet as binding as we had hoped". A warming of the climate has obviously taken hold of the industry, and publishers are also trying to create a good mood. At their congress (mid-September), they announced in a press release that - inspired by successful negotiations in the area of professional ethics - the two sides had also resumed discussions on social issues.
Both publishers and the Press Council are disappointed with the postponement decision. Guido Blumer, Chairman of the Ethics Department and chief negotiator on the publishers' side, is even "extremely disappointed" about the postponement. It had been "excellent negotiations". "Everyone is happy. Everyone has praised the result." He has little sympathy for the link made by the journalists' associations with the collective labor agreement. Press Council President Peter Studer is also "frustrated", especially about the fact that both associations - or at least some representatives - want to keep the Press Council as a "bargaining chip" in the CLA disputes. Studer hoped to be able to finalize the publishers' membership during his term of office. He had given "fiery speeches" at both journalists' organizations and demonstrated how strongly the publishers had been involved. In particular, there were no formal changes to the journalists' code.
According to Studer, the SRG negotiations are also "only millimetres away from a solution". SRG fears that it will be over-controlled in future, as it is already supervised by OFCOM, the ombudsman, the Independent Complaints Authority (ICA) and the Federal Supreme Court. In plain language: SRG fears a flood of complaints and thus an overload of editorial managers. And the SRG? It is once again being as secretive as the Kremlin once was. SRG is "positive" about the negotiations, explains media spokesperson Daniel Steiner. Negotiations will continue on the outstanding points. If that's not news.
Hans Stutz
