Sectorial perceptions
Swiss time-budget studies are available only for print and TV, but not for all media
In the case of electronic media, attention was also surveyed; in the case of print media, the topicality of the edition used, the number of contacts with the edition used and the amount of reading. In the analysis, titles and channels could only be counted as aggregated group values. The Must study attempted to take a new approach to intermedia comparison by making the relevant advertising environment comparable. It should:
- differentiate the strengths of traditional mass media,
- compare all media included on a fair basis,
- provide media planners with strategically useful information,
- do not enable any questionable arithmetic tricks and
- Check usefulness and application possibilities in the market and in daily planning practice with real data.
The study wanted to offer users the opportunity to use facts and figures to assess whether their target group is more likely to respond to print or electronic media. It was also intended to make it possible to compare the communication performance of print and electronic media. The benchmark used was not the reach, but the "media-specific, advertising-relevant environment", a rating value that measures the proportion of material actually used across all media. Combined with the daily schedule, it was possible to determine which broadcast media and which print groups the target audience responded to particularly well.
The respondents described the past 24 hours and chose from a list of 60 activities. Several simultaneous activities, such as cooking and listening to the radio, were also recorded.
Must covered a wide range of media, from the press to the cinema, from outdoor advertising to teletext, but also new media such as audiotex or online computer services. Its main benefit was that it measured not only the quantity, but above all the quality of media use. However, Must did not examine how much an individual title was used, but rather which type of media was used by which people on a particular day.
With this study, Wemf and Publicitas wanted to counter the SRG-Intermedia study because it neglects the print media. According to original plans, the pilot study was to be converted into a regularly published planning instrument around 1999 and then repeated every three to five years. These plans came to nothing.
While the SRG study is based on a fixed time grid in quarter-hour increments, respondents to the Must study were able to specify the start and end of the activities they mentioned to the minute. According to Must, this can be particularly important for short activities such as reading the newspaper. SRG idée suisse and Wemf/Publicitas were never able to agree to merge their two studies. Wolfgang Koschnick
