Letters to the editor
"I care!"I care very much about the future of our media! Their task and impact are too important to allow them to be treated or allowed to act like Masonic lodges. If, for example, Ingrid Deltenre's blood group has an influence
"I care!"I care very much about the future of our media! Their task and impact are too important to allow them to be treated or allowed to act like Masonic lodges. If, for example, Ingrid Deltenre's blood group had an influence on her understanding of her job, even such intimate information would be relevant for the interested public.
Tek Berhe, initiator and operator of the website faires-rtvg.ch, on the commentary "Who cares?" in WW 06/03
...
More creativity
The "Attractive advertising" conference you discussed did indeed offer more questions than answers. And yet it gave me a lot: proof that apportioning blame only polarizes and makes the creative search for alternatives more difficult. Next year, Script wants to tackle this important topic in a non-polemical and goal-oriented way. We want to look for new answers rather than raise familiar questions. With the help of other associations, which we hereby invite to participate, this could also succeed.
Stephanie Hugentobler, board member of the copywriters' association Script, on the article "Professionals instead of pin-ups" in WW 04/03
...
Ignorant review
I am not, as the reviewer claims, a "simple" editor of a single publication, but deputy editor-in-chief of the trade journals New Management and Schweizer Versicherung and was previously editor-in-chief of io management. Francis Müller's slam, garnished with many false assertions, does not defend the honor of the PR guild - to which the reviewer himself seems to belong - but only shows that he has not understood my picaresque novel one bit. For example, he has not understood that the (ironically meant) industry wisdom and sayings he criticizes are original quotes from writers of his ilk. There is no better proof of Müller's ignorance and the topicality of "The Bluff".
Robert Jakob, journalist and author of "The Bluff", on the review of his book in WW 03/03
Tek Berhe, initiator and operator of the website faires-rtvg.ch, on the commentary "Who cares?" in WW 06/03
...
More creativity
The "Attractive advertising" conference you discussed did indeed offer more questions than answers. And yet it gave me a lot: proof that apportioning blame only polarizes and makes the creative search for alternatives more difficult. Next year, Script wants to tackle this important topic in a non-polemical and goal-oriented way. We want to look for new answers rather than raise familiar questions. With the help of other associations, which we hereby invite to participate, this could also succeed.
Stephanie Hugentobler, board member of the copywriters' association Script, on the article "Professionals instead of pin-ups" in WW 04/03
...
Ignorant review
I am not, as the reviewer claims, a "simple" editor of a single publication, but deputy editor-in-chief of the trade journals New Management and Schweizer Versicherung and was previously editor-in-chief of io management. Francis Müller's slam, garnished with many false assertions, does not defend the honor of the PR guild - to which the reviewer himself seems to belong - but only shows that he has not understood my picaresque novel one bit. For example, he has not understood that the (ironically meant) industry wisdom and sayings he criticizes are original quotes from writers of his ilk. There is no better proof of Müller's ignorance and the topicality of "The Bluff".
Robert Jakob, journalist and author of "The Bluff", on the review of his book in WW 03/03
