Airport advertising The lack of passengers at Zurich Airport is causing Clear Channel Plakanda's sales and reach to plummet, and the projections made by Zurich Airport operator Unique in 2000 were optimistic, too optimistic. It assumed that passenger numbers in Zurich-Kloten alone would be around 25 million in 2003 and rise to 35 million by 2006. On this basis, it not only planned the expansion of the airport, but also negotiated an exclusive contract with Clear Channel Plakanda (CCP) for the marketing of poster sites in the airport. Such agreements are generally linked to passenger volumes (see box). CCP is therefore likely to have expected annual sales of between CHF 9.5 million (2001) and CHF 18 million (2006) when the contract was signed, while Unique expected annual fees of between CHF 7 million and CHF 15 million. Of the three major Swiss airports, only Geneva reported a slight increase in passenger volumes, while Zurich and Basel recorded significant declines. Although Unique will open the new Dock E from September 1, it will close parts of the existing Terminal B at the same time.
Not at all keen on tourists
How does CCP react to this? Because the poster sites in the
The building sections to be closed will be compensated for by locations in the new Dock E and elsewhere.
The development of turnover was not affected. Although passenger numbers are below budget according to planning, turnover at Zurich Airport was "practically maintained" in 2002, as CCP CEO Beat Roeschlin explains. He cites one reason for the increased attention per passenger: the quality of the target group. "Those traveling on business continue to fly, but the number of tourists is decreasing. This means that the target group, which has
income, decision-making authority and a good education." And that is why Zurich Airport is still more attractive for international advertising clients than Athens, for example, where the proportion of tourists at the airport is much higher. Even Frankfurt, with its respectable proportion of German travelers, is in no way inferior to Zurich with its broader mix of nationalities. Roeschlin: "The share of international advertising clients in total advertising revenue at Zurich Airport is now 50 percent."
However, if Zurich were to lose its role as an international hub and as a base for a home carrier, all of this would be jeopardized. No wonder Roeschlin is frowning at the economic development of Swiss.
CCP is therefore stepping up its efforts to improve the quality of its offering. This will enable the outdoor advertising company to offer customers new opportunities in the fall, when Dock E and parts of the Airside Center open: Entire sections of the building will be "rented out" at six locations. For example, a single customer can design the entry hall of the Airside Center. A glass wall around 60 meters long is available for this purpose, which can be covered with foil and backlit or onto which images can be projected. CCP calls this service "branding". It is also possible to display 3D objects or flags. Roeschlin is thinking of a term of three to five years for such commitments. The risk for CCP: customers have to be acquired first.
The branding concept is the result of an initiative by CCP. Initially, classic poster sites were planned in the new halls. As early as 2001, however, CPP organized a tour of the USA, and in autumn 2002 Unique agreed to the new concept.
Fewer tourists and more business travelers enable a sharper target group profile for poster advertising at airports.
High-turnover poster sitesPoster sites at airports are in demand, as this is where a high-spending public moves around. Thanks to the relatively long length of stay - the average passenger arrives 85 minutes before departure - the opportunities for contact are also high. In 1998, outdoor advertising at the top ten European airports generated advertising revenue of around 40 centimes per passenger. Today, the figure in Zurich is around 50 centimes, while the average European yield has remained at the 1998 level due to September 11 (according to a survey by Compass International Media Ltd.). Depending on the contract, 66 to 85 percent of this revenue must be handed over to the respective airport operators. (mk)
APG had better luckThe Allgemeine Plakatgesellschaft (APG) manages Geneva and Lugano airports, while APG, JCDecaux and CCP are active in Basel. While Basel, like Zurich, recorded around 14 percent fewer passengers last year, Lugano remained almost stable, while Geneva saw a slight increase. Noël Grandchamp, Director of Berger SA, the APG subsidiary responsible for airport advertising, is "satisfied" with the development. (mk)
Number of passengers (in millions)
2001 2002 Change in %
Zurich-Kloten 21.0 18.0 -15
Geneva-Cointrin 7.55 7.62 +1
Basel-Mulhouse 3.55 3.06 -14
Markus Knöpfli